Assignee
BERGER IND INC
US·17 granted patents·564 citations·filing 1975–1992
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
17 records- 0196US4835342AStrain relief liquid tight electrical connectorBERGER IND INC·Filed 1988·Granted May 30, 1989·146 cites·15 claims
- 0283US4047743ALight walled conduitBERGER IND INC·Filed 1975·Granted Sep 13, 1977·51 cites·5 claims
- 0381USD287396SCompression sealing gasket for a liquid-tight fittingBERGER IND INC·Filed 1983·Granted Dec 23, 1986·17 cites·1 claims
- 0480USD339793SElectrical box connector couplingBERGER IND INC·Filed 1992·Granted Sep 28, 1993·26 cites·1 claims
- 0580USD336282SElectrical connectorBERGER IND INC·Filed 1989·Granted Jun 8, 1993·19 cites·1 claims
- 0680US4368997APivot jointBERGER IND INC·Filed 1981·Granted Jan 18, 1983·32 cites·12 claims
- 0779US4050722AJoint for conduitBERGER IND INC·Filed 1975·Granted Sep 27, 1977·38 cites·8 claims
- 0877US5087795AStrain relief liquid tight electrical connectorBERGER IND INC·Filed 1990·Granted Feb 11, 1992·49 cites·17 claims
- 0973US5283393AArmored flexible electrical conduit with fittingsBERGER IND INC·Filed 1992·Granted Feb 1, 1994·35 cites·4 claims
- 1072US5165735AElectrical fitting for conduit connectionBERGER IND INC·Filed 1991·Granted Nov 24, 1992·36 cites·18 claims
- 1162US4435005AJoint for conduit with single threaded endBERGER IND INC·Filed 1980·Granted Mar 6, 1984·28 cites·16 claims
- 1261US4146252APipe coupling arrangementBERGER IND INC·Filed 1978·Granted Mar 27, 1979·23 cites·16 claims
- 1359USD339792SElectrical couplingBERGER IND INC·Filed 1992·Granted Sep 28, 1993·11 cites·1 claims
- 1455US4005879AConduit jointBERGER IND INC·Filed 1975·Granted Feb 1, 1977·20 cites·7 claims
- 1546US3984130APipe joint for an intermediate metal conduitBERGER IND INC·Filed 1975·Granted Oct 5, 1976·15 cites·10 claims
- 1643US4082319ACoupling sleeveBERGER IND INC·Filed 1976·Granted Apr 4, 1978·12 cites·6 claims
- 1736US4096556ALamp harpBERGER IND INC·Filed 1976·Granted Jun 20, 1978·6 cites·5 claims
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →