Individual holder
GEORGESON GARY E
US·10 granted patents·1 pending application·95 citations·filing 2007–2012
Individually held — no corporate assignee on record.
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
11 records- 0197US9085052B1Structural repair having optical witness and method of monitoring repair performanceGEORGESON GARY E·Filed 2011·Granted Jul 21, 2015·28 cites·14 claims
- 0294US8691383B2Blunt impact indicator tape and methodGEORGESON GARY E·Filed 2011·Granted Apr 8, 2014·22 cites·22 claims
- 0392US9188566B2Ultrasound inspection system of limited access composite structuresGEORGESON GARY E·Filed 2012·Granted Nov 17, 2015·9 cites·14 claims
- 0488US8397580B2Multi-ferroic structural health monitoring systems and methodsGEORGESON GARY E·Filed 2010·Granted Mar 19, 2013·6 cites·8 claims
- 0587US9310317B2Automated system and method for tracking and detecting discrepancies on a target objectGEORGESON GARY E·Filed 2012·Granted Apr 12, 2016·6 cites·20 claims
- 0684US9239315B1Patch and methods for monitoring a structure including a patchGEORGESON GARY E·Filed 2010·Granted Jan 19, 2016·5 cites·19 claims
- 0778US8198617B2Locating a component underneath a surface of a target object and locating an access panel for accessing the componentGEORGESON GARY E·Filed 2008·Granted Jun 12, 2012·13 cites·20 claims
- 0872US9020767B2Wireless fuel monitoring systemGEORGESON GARY E·Filed 2011·Granted Apr 28, 2015·3 cites·20 claims
- 0955US8324911B2Gap mapping for fitting composite doublersGEORGESON GARY E·Filed 2007·Granted Dec 4, 2012·2 cites·25 claims
- 1050US8878698B2Lightning strike detectionGEORGESON GARY E·Filed 2008·Granted Nov 4, 2014·1 cites·15 claims
- 1140US2011295426A1Robotic snakes for use in non-destructive evaluation and maintenance operationsGEORGESON GARY E·Filed 2010·Application pending·0 cites
Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Get an alert when GEORGESON GARY E files or is granted a new patent.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →