Assignee
NEUCO INC
US·11 granted patents·3 pending applications·237 citations·filing 1998–2014
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
14 records- 0195US6736089B1Method and system for sootblowing optimizationNEUCO INC·Filed 2003·Granted May 18, 2004·79 cites·51 claims
- 0288US8527072B2System and method for multi-unit optimization of boiler and SCR operationsNEUCO INC·Filed 2012·Granted Sep 3, 2013·9 cites·16 claims
- 0385US7164954B2Method for implementing indirect controllerNEUCO INC·Filed 2005·Granted Jan 16, 2007·24 cites·26 claims
- 0482US8924024B2Method for sootblowing optimizationNEUCO INC·Filed 2013·Granted Dec 30, 2014·2 cites·20 claims
- 0579US5913977AApparatus and method for internally coating live gas pipe joints or other discontinuitiesNEUCO INC·Filed 1998·Granted Jun 22, 1999·42 cites·17 claims
- 0669US7333861B2Method and system for calculating marginal cost curves using plant control modelsNEUCO INC·Filed 2005·Granted Feb 19, 2008·6 cites·27 claims
- 0766US6514346B1Method and apparatus for inserting and propelling a coating device into and through live gas pipelineNEUCO INC·Filed 1999·Granted Feb 4, 2003·32 cites·11 claims
- 0865US7458342B2Method and system for sootblowing optimizationNEUCO INC·Filed 2004·Granted Dec 2, 2008·9 cites·9 claims
- 0965US7400935B2Method for implementing indirect controllerNEUCO INC·Filed 2007·Granted Jul 15, 2008·5 cites·45 claims
- 1065US7194320B2Method for implementing indirect controllerNEUCO INC·Filed 2003·Granted Mar 20, 2007·17 cites·15 claims
- 1160US7500437B2Method and system for SCR optimizationNEUCO INC·Filed 2004·Granted Mar 10, 2009·12 cites·4 claims
- 1243US2006052902A1Method and system for SNCR optimizationNEUCO INC·Filed 2005·Application pending·0 cites
- 1342US2006121616A1Method and system for increasing efficiency of FGD operation in fossil fuel boilersNEUCO INC·Filed 2005·Application pending·0 cites
- 1439US2016230699A1Combined cycle power generation optimization systemNEUCO INC·Filed 2014·Application pending·0 cites
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →