Assignee
SARTORIUS WERKE GMBH
12 granted patents·161 citations·filing 1976–1978
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
12 records- 0186US4153124AElectromagnetically compensating beam balanceSARTORIUS WERKE GMBH·Filed 1977·Granted May 8, 1979·30 cites·14 claims
- 0284US4156361ACalibratable electromagnetically compensating balanceSARTORIUS WERKE GMBH·Filed 1977·Granted May 29, 1979·30 cites·21 claims
- 0376US4058007AVibrating wire measuring instrumentSARTORIUS WERKE GMBH·Filed 1976·Granted Nov 15, 1977·34 cites·12 claims
- 0472US4062416AElectromagnetically compensating beamless dynamometer or weighing machineSARTORIUS WERKE GMBH·Filed 1976·Granted Dec 13, 1977·19 cites·22 claims
- 0564US4153126AParallel construction for a top-loading balanceSARTORIUS WERKE GMBH·Filed 1978·Granted May 8, 1979·14 cites·13 claims
- 0656US4150730AElectromagnetically compensating weighing or force-measuring deviceSARTORIUS WERKE GMBH·Filed 1977·Granted Apr 24, 1979·10 cites·27 claims
- 0755US4004458AElectromagnetically compensated balance or dynamometerSARTORIUS WERKE GMBH·Filed 1976·Granted Jan 25, 1977·10 cites·11 claims
- 0842US4091886ACompensating force-measuring or weighing deviceSARTORIUS WERKE GMBH·Filed 1977·Granted May 30, 1978·5 cites·10 claims
- 0937US4103750AMethod of and circuit for forming signals for damping control of an electrical measured-value indicatorSARTORIUS WERKE GMBH·Filed 1977·Granted Aug 1, 1978·3 cites·15 claims
- 1035US4060771AMethod and circuit arrangement for conditioning direct current signals in electric measurand transmitters, particularly electromechanical precision and fine balancesSARTORIUS WERKE GMBH·Filed 1976·Granted Nov 29, 1977·3 cites·8 claims
- 1134US4074781AElectromagnetically compensating weighing or dynamometer apparatusSARTORIUS WERKE GMBH·Filed 1976·Granted Feb 21, 1978·2 cites·9 claims
- 1232US4085811AElectromagnetically compensating beamless dynamometer or weighing deviceSARTORIUS WERKE GMBH·Filed 1976·Granted Apr 25, 1978·1 cites·19 claims
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →