Assignee
CHUBB & SONS LOCK & SAFE CO
GB·16 granted patents·304 citations·filing 1977–1986
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
16 records- 0184US4574454AMethod of constructing fire resistant enclosuresCHUBB & SONS LOCK & SAFE CO·Filed 1985·Granted Mar 11, 1986·70 cites·11 claims
- 0279US4389948ASecurity enclosuresCHUBB & SONS LOCK & SAFE CO·Filed 1981·Granted Jun 28, 1983·48 cites·16 claims
- 0378US4106316AKeyless combination locksCHUBB & SONS LOCK & SAFE CO·Filed 1977·Granted Aug 15, 1978·33 cites·10 claims
- 0474US4196347ASecurity systemsCHUBB & SONS LOCK & SAFE CO·Filed 1978·Granted Apr 1, 1980·51 cites·9 claims
- 0566US4694666AShackle mechanismsCHUBB & SONS LOCK & SAFE CO·Filed 1985·Granted Sep 22, 1987·31 cites·2 claims
- 0660US4470275ASecurity enclosuresCHUBB & SONS LOCK & SAFE CO·Filed 1981·Granted Sep 11, 1984·16 cites·2 claims
- 0748US4534191ASecurity lock for sliding doorsCHUBB & SONS LOCK & SAFE CO·Filed 1983·Granted Aug 13, 1985·15 cites·8 claims
- 0838US4850623ALocking mechanismsCHUBB & SONS LOCK & SAFE CO·Filed 1984·Granted Jul 25, 1989·13 cites·8 claims
- 0931US4530222ACylinder locksCHUBB & SONS LOCK & SAFE CO·Filed 1982·Granted Jul 23, 1985·6 cites·9 claims
- 1030US4506530AKey-operated lockCHUBB & SONS LOCK & SAFE CO·Filed 1983·Granted Mar 26, 1985·5 cites·6 claims
- 1129US4224861AVaults and strongroomsCHUBB & SONS LOCK & SAFE CO·Filed 1979·Granted Sep 30, 1980·5 cites·10 claims
- 1228US4257249ACombination lockCHUBB & SONS LOCK & SAFE CO·Filed 1978·Granted Mar 24, 1981·7 cites·6 claims
- 1326US4182145AKey-operated locksCHUBB & SONS LOCK & SAFE CO·Filed 1978·Granted Jan 8, 1980·1 cites·12 claims
- 1425US4407204ADoor-locking mechanisms for security enclosuresCHUBB & SONS LOCK & SAFE CO·Filed 1981·Granted Oct 4, 1983·0 cites·12 claims
- 1521US4707005ALatching mechanismCHUBB & SONS LOCK & SAFE CO·Filed 1986·Granted Nov 17, 1987·1 cites·5 claims
- 1618US4445718ASecurity doorsCHUBB & SONS LOCK & SAFE CO·Filed 1982·Granted May 1, 1984·2 cites·4 claims
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →