Assignee
DORST MASCH & ANLAGEN
DE·11 granted patents·105 citations·filing 1982–2001
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
11 records- 0178US4482307APress for producing true-to-size workpieces using powder materialsDORST MASCH & ANLAGEN·Filed 1982·Granted Nov 13, 1984·25 cites·12 claims
- 0271US5049054APress having a tool mount to be inserted into the pressDORST MASCH & ANLAGEN·Filed 1990·Granted Sep 17, 1991·22 cites·15 claims
- 0362US6656395B2Process for determining press parameters for pressing complex structured materialsDORST MASCH & ANLAGEN·Filed 2001·Granted Dec 2, 2003·6 cites·4 claims
- 0442US5874114APress for producing compacts from powdery materialDORST MASCH & ANLAGEN·Filed 1995·Granted Feb 23, 1999·9 cites·8 claims
- 0542US4913640APress for making sanitary articles, in particular toilet bowls, by pressure castingDORST MASCH & ANLAGEN·Filed 1988·Granted Apr 3, 1990·11 cites·22 claims
- 0641US4518341APress for manufacturing plates, etc.DORST MASCH & ANLAGEN·Filed 1984·Granted May 21, 1985·13 cites·9 claims
- 0739US5080573AIsostatic press for making compacts of powdered ceramic materialDORST MASCH & ANLAGEN·Filed 1990·Granted Jan 14, 1992·9 cites·12 claims
- 0825US6343715B1Filling apparatus for axial powder pressesDORST MASCH & ANLAGEN·Filed 1999·Granted Feb 5, 2002·7 cites·18 claims
- 0923US5635219ASlide opening system for a tool system for compacting powdery materialsDORST MASCH & ANLAGEN·Filed 1995·Granted Jun 3, 1997·1 cites·20 claims
- 1020US5713272APowder press with mechanical-hydraulic shuttle controlDORST MASCH & ANLAGEN·Filed 1996·Granted Feb 3, 1998·1 cites·16 claims
- 1111US4701122APressing tool for producing dish-shaped pressed objects, in particular plates, cups, bowls, etc., of powders, preferably ceramic materialDORST MASCH & ANLAGEN·Filed 1986·Granted Oct 20, 1987·1 cites·7 claims
Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Get an alert when DORST MASCH & ANLAGEN files or is granted a new patent.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →