Assignee
INT DIAGNOSTIC TECH
14 granted patents·663 citations·filing 1975–1979
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
14 records- 0196US3992631AFluorometric system, method and test articleINT DIAGNOSTIC TECH·Filed 1975·Granted Nov 16, 1976·94 cites·8 claims
- 0294US4133639ATest article including a covalently attached diagnostic reagent and methodINT DIAGNOSTIC TECH·Filed 1976·Granted Jan 9, 1979·68 cites·13 claims
- 0394US4020151AMethod for quantitation of antigens or antibodies on a solid surfaceINT DIAGNOSTIC TECH·Filed 1976·Granted Apr 26, 1977·90 cites·10 claims
- 0492US4294817AMethod of fluoro immunoassayINT DIAGNOSTIC TECH·Filed 1978·Granted Oct 13, 1981·73 cites·14 claims
- 0592US4144452AFluorometric system, method and test articleINT DIAGNOSTIC TECH·Filed 1977·Granted Mar 13, 1979·62 cites·1 claims
- 0692US4067959AIndirect solid surface test for antigens or antibodiesINT DIAGNOSTIC TECH·Filed 1976·Granted Jan 10, 1978·69 cites·28 claims
- 0789US4385126ADouble tagged immunoassayINT DIAGNOSTIC TECH·Filed 1979·Granted May 24, 1983·81 cites·6 claims
- 0881US4056724AFluorometric system, method and test articleINT DIAGNOSTIC TECH·Filed 1976·Granted Nov 1, 1977·34 cites·10 claims
- 0975US3999948ADiagnostic reagent holder and methodINT DIAGNOSTIC TECH·Filed 1975·Granted Dec 28, 1976·37 cites·21 claims
- 1061US4163779ATest for quantitation of immunoglobulin and identification of abnormal immunoglobulinINT DIAGNOSTIC TECH·Filed 1978·Granted Aug 7, 1979·16 cites·5 claims
- 1158US4243322AMethod and apparatus for photoluminescent detection and measurementINT DIAGNOSTIC TECH·Filed 1978·Granted Jan 6, 1981·15 cites·3 claims
- 1257US4025310AMethod for reading a wet fluorescent surfaceINT DIAGNOSTIC TECH·Filed 1976·Granted May 24, 1977·14 cites·13 claims
- 1344US4171311AImides of thyroxin and triiodothyronineINT DIAGNOSTIC TECH·Filed 1978·Granted Oct 16, 1979·7 cites·2 claims
- 1432US4238449AReagent holderINT DIAGNOSTIC TECH·Filed 1979·Granted Dec 9, 1980·3 cites·1 claims
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →