Assignee
KIRIN TECHNO SYSTEM CORP
JP·13 granted patents·341 citations·filing 1990–2007
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
13 records- 0182US7602487B2Surface inspection apparatus and surface inspection head apparatusKIRIN TECHNO SYSTEM CORP·Filed 2007·Granted Oct 13, 2009·11 cites·2 claims
- 0282US7329855B2Optical inspection of glass bottles using multiple camerasKIRIN TECHNO SYSTEM CORP·Filed 2002·Granted Feb 12, 2008·28 cites·9 claims
- 0381US5404227AContainer inspecting apparatus having rotary indexing apparatusKIRIN TECHNO SYSTEM CORP·Filed 1993·Granted Apr 4, 1995·55 cites·12 claims
- 0479US5444480AMethod of inspecting solid body for foreign matterKIRIN TECHNO SYSTEM CORP·Filed 1993·Granted Aug 22, 1995·65 cites·8 claims
- 0575US7330251B2Method and apparatus for producing reference image in glass bottle inspecting apparatusKIRIN TECHNO SYSTEM CORP·Filed 2002·Granted Feb 12, 2008·14 cites·12 claims
- 0672US6661911B1Automatic inspecting apparatus by image processingKIRIN TECHNO SYSTEM CORP·Filed 2000·Granted Dec 9, 2003·24 cites·3 claims
- 0770US5353909AFeeding and indexing apparatusKIRIN TECHNO SYSTEM CORP·Filed 1993·Granted Oct 11, 1994·33 cites·7 claims
- 0869US5074397ARotary index apparatusKIRIN TECHNO SYSTEM CORP·Filed 1990·Granted Dec 24, 1991·29 cites·19 claims
- 0965US6304323B1Method for detecting defect in bottleKIRIN TECHNO SYSTEM CORP·Filed 1999·Granted Oct 16, 2001·33 cites·2 claims
- 1064US5880359AContainer inspecting apparatusKIRIN TECHNO SYSTEM CORP·Filed 1997·Granted Mar 9, 1999·29 cites·8 claims
- 1149US7434857B2Chuck device of container, transportation device with the same, and chuck claw for the transportation deviceKIRIN TECHNO SYSTEM CORP·Filed 2003·Granted Oct 14, 2008·6 cites·13 claims
- 1240US7057157B2Photosensor device and disk inspection apparatus using itKIRIN TECHNO SYSTEM CORP·Filed 2001·Granted Jun 6, 2006·5 cites·1 claims
- 1335US6296102B1Container rejecting apparatusKIRIN TECHNO SYSTEM CORP·Filed 1999·Granted Oct 2, 2001·9 cites·8 claims
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →