Assignee
LILLIBRIDGE MARK DAVID
US·9 granted patents·4 pending applications·97 citations·filing 2005–2012
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
13 records- 0194US8782368B2Storing chunks in containersLILLIBRIDGE MARK DAVID·Filed 2010·Granted Jul 15, 2014·31 cites·18 claims
- 0292US8280906B1Method and system for retaining offers for delivering targeted data in a system for targeted data deliveryLILLIBRIDGE MARK DAVID·Filed 2005·Granted Oct 2, 2012·34 cites·26 claims
- 0390US8589406B2Deduplication while rebuilding indexesLILLIBRIDGE MARK DAVID·Filed 2011·Granted Nov 19, 2013·14 cites·19 claims
- 0476US8499131B2Capping a number of locations referred to by chunk referencesLILLIBRIDGE MARK DAVID·Filed 2010·Granted Jul 30, 2013·5 cites·19 claims
- 0571US8117343B2Landmark chunking of landmarkless regionsLILLIBRIDGE MARK DAVID·Filed 2008·Granted Feb 14, 2012·5 cites·19 claims
- 0668US8959089B2Data processing apparatus and method of processing dataLILLIBRIDGE MARK DAVID·Filed 2008·Granted Feb 17, 2015·4 cites·20 claims
- 0767US8904128B2Processing a request to restore deduplicated dataLILLIBRIDGE MARK DAVID·Filed 2011·Granted Dec 2, 2014·2 cites·20 claims
- 0862US9141621B2Copying a differential data store into temporary storage media in response to a requestLILLIBRIDGE MARK DAVID·Filed 2009·Granted Sep 22, 2015·2 cites·20 claims
- 0951US9130852B2Generating a summary of users that have accessed a resourceLILLIBRIDGE MARK DAVID·Filed 2009·Granted Sep 8, 2015·0 cites·19 claims
- 1049US2010281077A1Batching requests for accessing differential data storesLILLIBRIDGE MARK DAVID·Filed 2009·Application pending·0 cites
- 1143US2015293949A1Data sampling deduplicationLILLIBRIDGE MARK DAVID·Filed 2012·Application pending·0 cites
- 1241US2012158674A1Indexing for deduplicationLILLIBRIDGE MARK DAVID·Filed 2010·Application pending·0 cites
- 1333US2012036113A1Performing deduplication of input data at plural levelsLILLIBRIDGE MARK DAVID·Filed 2010·Application pending·0 cites
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →