Assignee
STOUGHTON ROLAND
US·2 granted patents·9 pending applications·1 citations·filing 2005–2013
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
11 records- 0177US8521441B2Method and computer program product for reducing fluorophore-specific biasSTOUGHTON ROLAND·Filed 2005·Granted Aug 27, 2013·1 cites·11 claims
- 0272US2009280492A1Diagnosis of fetal abnormalities using polymorphisms including short tandem repeatsSTOUGHTON ROLAND·Filed 2009·Application pending·0 cites
- 0371US2009291443A1Use of highly parallel snp genotyping for fetal diagnosisSTOUGHTON ROLAND·Filed 2009·Application pending·0 cites
- 0468US2013288242A1Determination of fetal aneuploidy by quantification of genomic dna from mixed samplesSTOUGHTON ROLAND·Filed 2013·Application pending·0 cites
- 0567US2008050739A1Diagnosis of fetal abnormalities using polymorphisms including short tandem repeatsSTOUGHTON ROLAND·Filed 2007·Application pending·0 cites
- 0667US2013210644A1Fetal aneuploidy detection by sequencingSTOUGHTON ROLAND·Filed 2013·Application pending·0 cites
- 0766US2008070792A1Use of highly parallel snp genotyping for fetal diagnosisSTOUGHTON ROLAND·Filed 2007·Application pending·0 cites
- 0865US2012183963A1Determination of fetal aneuploidy by quantification of genomic dna from mixed samplesSTOUGHTON ROLAND·Filed 2012·Application pending·0 cites
- 0956US2010112586A1Diagnosis of fetal abnormalities by comparative genomic hybridization analysisSTOUGHTON ROLAND·Filed 2009·Application pending·0 cites
- 1052US8412460B2Methods and systems for characterizing a cellular constituent using response profilesSTOUGHTON ROLAND·Filed 2010·Granted Apr 2, 2013·0 cites·41 claims
- 1152US2008026390A1Diagnosis of Fetal Abnormalities by Comparative Genomic Hybridization AnalysisSTOUGHTON ROLAND·Filed 2007·Application pending·0 cites
Join the waitlist — get patent alerts
Get an alert when STOUGHTON ROLAND files or is granted a new patent.
We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →