Assignee
TACIT KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS INC
US·9 granted patents·2,171 citations·filing 1998–2001
Top patents by PatentIndex Score
9 records- 0198US6647384B2Method and apparatus for managing user profiles including identifying users based on matched query termTACIT KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS INC·Filed 2001·Granted Nov 11, 2003·219 cites·18 claims
- 0298US6421669B1Method and apparatus for constructing and maintaining a user knowledge profileTACIT KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS INC·Filed 2000·Granted Jul 16, 2002·336 cites·62 claims
- 0398US6405197B2Method of constructing and displaying an entity profile constructed utilizing input from entities other than the ownerTACIT KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS INC·Filed 1999·Granted Jun 11, 2002·309 cites·16 claims
- 0498US6253202B1Method, system and apparatus for authorizing access by a first user to a knowledge profile of a second user responsive to an access request from the first userTACIT KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS INC·Filed 1998·Granted Jun 26, 2001·385 cites·29 claims
- 0597US6115709AMethod and system for constructing a knowledge profile of a user having unrestricted and restricted access portions according to respective levels of confidence of content of the portionsTACIT KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS INC·Filed 1998·Granted Sep 5, 2000·477 cites·67 claims
- 0693US6640229B1Automatic management of terms in a user profile in a knowledge management systemTACIT KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS INC·Filed 2000·Granted Oct 28, 2003·133 cites·14 claims
- 0786US6668251B1Rendering discriminator members from an initial set of result dataTACIT KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS INC·Filed 2000·Granted Dec 23, 2003·54 cites·30 claims
- 0883US6711570B1System and method for matching terms contained in an electronic document with a set of user profilesTACIT KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS INC·Filed 2000·Granted Mar 23, 2004·44 cites·45 claims
- 0978US6377949B1Method and apparatus for assigning a confidence level to a term within a user knowledge profileTACIT KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS INC·Filed 1998·Granted Apr 23, 2002·214 cites·37 claims
Counts cover granted patents and pending applications in the PatentIndex corpus. How scoring works →