US11307095B2ActiveUtilityA1

Systems and methods for in situ optimization of tunable light emitting diode sources

64
Assignee: CHEMIMAGE CORPPriority: Dec 4, 2019Filed: Dec 4, 2020Granted: Apr 19, 2022
Est. expiryDec 4, 2039(~13.4 yrs left)· nominal 20-yr term from priority
G01J 2003/283G01J 2003/2826G01J 2003/2806G01J 3/2823G01J 3/2803G01J 3/10G01J 3/12G01J 2003/1282G01J 3/42
64
PatentIndex Score
0
Cited by
5
References
26
Claims

Abstract

Systems for and methods for in situ optimization of tunable light emitting diode sources are disclosed herein. During operation, the systems and methods obtain real-time feedback from an image sensor, and that feedback is used to tune the tunable LEDs. By tuning the tunable LEDs, the best values for the LED spectral output can be selected based on the feedback from the image sensor, and an image with improved contrast is obtained. Alternatively, the amount of time to obtain an image with acceptable contrast is reduced.

Claims

exact text as granted — not AI-modified
The invention claimed is: 
     
       1. A system comprising:
 a processor; and 
 a non-transitory processor-readable storage medium in operable communication with the processor, wherein the storage medium contains one or more programming instructions that, when executed, cause the processor to perform the following:
 receiving at least a first data set and a second data set from an image sensor, the first and second data sets being collected by the image sensor based on illumination of a sample using a tunable light emitting diode source having a plurality of tuning states corresponding to a plurality of illumination spectrums, wherein the first data set and the second data set are associated with a first tuning state associated with a first illumination spectrum and a second tuning state associated with a second illumination spectrum of the tunable light emitting diode source, respectively; 
 generating a score image data set based on an optical computation applied to the first and second data sets; 
 determining whether the score image data set satisfies a tolerance level; and 
 generating a set of test data based on the score image data set when the score image data set satisfies the tolerance level. 
 
 
     
     
       2. The system of  claim 1 , wherein the storage medium contains at least one additional programming instruction that, when executed, cause the processor to perform the following:
 analyzing the set of test data to determine at least one characteristic of the sample. 
 
     
     
       3. The system of  claim 2 , wherein the at least one characteristic comprises one or more of a presence of an analyte in the sample, an absence of the analyte in the sample, a classification of the analyte, a non-classification of the analyte, or a concentration of the analyte. 
     
     
       4. The system of  claim 1 , wherein the first data set is representative of a first set of interacted photons based on the first illumination spectrum and the second data set is representative of a second set of interacted photons based on the second illumination spectrum. 
     
     
       5. The system of  claim 4 , wherein the first set of interacted photons and the second set of interacted photons comprise one or more of photons absorbed by the sample, photons reflected from the sample, photons scattered by the sample, photons emitted by the sample, or photons transmitted through the samples. 
     
     
       6. The system of  claim 1 , wherein the set of test data provides visual contrast between the sample and background materials. 
     
     
       7. The system of  claim 1 , wherein the storage medium contains at least one additional programming instruction that, when executed, cause the processor to perform the following:
 repeating the receiving, generating, and determining steps for at least one additional tuning state in response to the score image set of data not satisfying the tolerance level. 
 
     
     
       8. The system of  claim 7 , wherein the repeating is performed until the tolerance level is satisfied. 
     
     
       9. The system of  claim 7 , wherein the repeating is performed a pre-determined number of times or for a pre-determined amount of time. 
     
     
       10. The system of  claim 1 , wherein the first data set comprises a first image (T1) and the second data set comprises a second image (T2), and the optical computation comprises one or more of T1+T2, T1−T2, T1*T2, T1/T2, or combinations thereof. 
     
     
       11. The system of  claim 1 , wherein the tolerance level comprises at least one figure of merit. 
     
     
       12. The system of  claim 1 , wherein the at least one figure of merit comprises one or more of an area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve, standard error of calibration (SEC), signal to noise ratio (SNR), a Fisher contrast ratio, standard error of prediction (SEP), or optical throughput (% T). 
     
     
       13. The system of  claim 1 , wherein the tunable light emitting diode has a plurality of channels corresponding to a band of light and each combination of the plurality of channels corresponds to one of the plurality of tuning states. 
     
     
       14. A system comprising:
 a tunable light emitting diode source having a plurality of tuning states corresponding to a plurality of illumination spectrums; 
 an image sensor; and 
 a computing device comprising:
 a processor; and 
 a non-transitory processor-readable storage medium in operable communication with the processor, wherein the storage medium contains one or more programming instructions that, when executed, cause the processor to perform the following:
 receiving at least a first data set and a second data set from the image sensor, the first and second data sets being collected by the image sensor based on illumination of a sample using, wherein the first data set and the second data set are associated with a first tuning state associated with a first illumination spectrum and a second tuning state associated with a second illumination spectrum of the tunable light emitting diode source, respectively; 
 generating a score image data set based on an optical computation applied to the first and second data sets; 
 determining whether the score image data set satisfies a tolerance level; and 
 generating a set of test data based on the score image data set when the score image data set satisfies the tolerance level. 
 
 
 
     
     
       15. The system of  claim 14 , wherein the storage medium contains at least one additional programming instruction that, when executed, cause the processor to perform the following:
 analyzing the set of test data to determine at least one characteristic of the sample. 
 
     
     
       16. The system of  claim 15 , wherein the at least one characteristic comprises one or more of a presence of an analyte in the sample, an absence of the analyte in the sample, a classification of the analyte, a non-classification of the analyte, or a concentration of the analyte. 
     
     
       17. The system of  claim 14 , wherein the first data set is representative of a first set of interacted photons based on the first illumination spectrum and the second data set is representative of a second set of interacted photons based on the second illumination spectrum. 
     
     
       18. The system of  claim 17 , wherein the first set of interacted photons and the second set of interacted photons comprise one or more of photons absorbed by the sample, photons reflected from the sample, photons scattered by the sample, photons emitted by the sample, or photons transmitted through the sample. 
     
     
       19. The system of  claim 14 , wherein the set of test data provides visual contrast between the sample and background materials. 
     
     
       20. The system of  claim 14 , wherein the storage medium contains at least one additional programming instruction that, when executed, cause the processor to perform the following:
 repeating the receiving, generating, and determining steps for at least one additional tuning state in response to the score image set of data not satisfying the tolerance level. 
 
     
     
       21. The system of  claim 20 , wherein the repeating is performed until the tolerance level is satisfied. 
     
     
       22. The system of  claim 20 , wherein the repeating is performed a pre-determined number of times or for a pre-determined amount of time. 
     
     
       23. The system of  claim 14 , wherein the first data set comprises a first image (T1) and the second data set comprises a second image (T2), and the optical computation comprises one or more of T1+T2, T1−T2, T1*T2, T1/T2, or combinations thereof. 
     
     
       24. The system of  claim 14 , wherein the tolerance level comprises at least one figure of merit. 
     
     
       25. The system of  claim 14 , wherein the at least one figure of merit comprises one or more of an area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve, standard error of calibration (SEC), signal to noise ratio (SNR), a Fisher contrast ratio, standard error of prediction (SEP), or optical throughput (% T). 
     
     
       26. The system of  claim 14 , wherein the tunable light emitting diode has a plurality of channels corresponding to a band of light and each combination of the plurality of channels corresponds to one of the plurality of tuning states.

Cited by (0)

No later patents cite this yet.

References (0)

No backward citations on record.