US2005240568A1PendingUtilityA1

Method for collective decision-making

34
Assignee: BANERJEE DWIP NPriority: Aug 7, 2001Filed: Jun 29, 2005Published: Oct 27, 2005
Est. expiryAug 7, 2021(expired)· nominal 20-yr term from priority
Y10S707/99932Y10S707/99933G06Q 10/00Y10S707/99936
34
PatentIndex Score
0
Cited by
0
References
0
Claims

Abstract

A method and a computer program product for promoting collaborative, consensus-driven decisions from a plurality of decision-making entities using electronic communications in a real-time forum. The inventive instant messaging application can be used for registering participants, developing forum pages, communicating queries, receiving messages and tallying responses that can enable implementation of online trading transactions. The application module and support databases are maintained by one or more central coordinators that reside as software objects on a server. Setpoint values are used for measuring the extent to which the participants' cumulative response satisfies one or more decision parameters. Arbitration and intra-group caucusing can also be initiated as a means to promote consensus and arrive at a collective decision. The collective decision can be used to initiate a specific course of action that may involve further communications with one or more remote trading networks.

Claims

exact text as granted — not AI-modified
1 . A computer implemented method comprising: 
 maintaining identification for a plurality of decision-making entities in a memory device, wherein the decision making entities are individuals, families, groups, employees, employers or combinations thereof;    maintaining a setpoint representing a minimum cumulative support required for a computer to automatically implement a proposed action;    communicating a query to the plurality of decision-making entities, wherein the query includes a description of the proposed action;    receiving responses to the query from the plurality of decision-making entities, wherein each response includes an indicator of support for the proposed action;    determining the cumulative support from the query responses received; and    automatically implementing the proposed action if the cumulative support is greater than the setpoint.    
   
   
       2 . The method of  claim 1 , further comprising; 
 communicating messages to one or more of the decision-making entities.    
   
   
       3 . The method of  claim 1 , further comprising: 
 communicating messages from one or more of the decision-making entities to at least one different decision-making entity.    
   
   
       4 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the indication of support is of a type selected from qualitative, quantitative, functional or a combination thereof.  
   
   
       5 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the step of automatically implementing the decision includes transmitting an instruction to one or more trading networks.  
   
   
       6 . The method of  claim 1 , further comprising: 
 imposing arbitration among the plurality of decision-making entities if the query responses provide cumulative support less than the minimum setpoint value.    
   
   
       7 . The method of  claim 1 , further comprising: 
 initiating an intra-group caucus between a plurality of the decision-making entities.    
   
   
       8 . The method of  claim 1 , further comprising: 
 receiving a request from one of the decision-making entities to initiate a query, wherein the request includes the proposed action.    
   
   
       9 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the query is formulated by one of the plurality of decision-making entities and transmitted to a central coordinator for subsequent communication to the plurality of decision-making entities.  
   
   
       10 . The method of  claim 9 , wherein the setpoint is established by the decision-making entity that formulates the query.  
   
   
       11 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the step of implementing the decision comprises transmitting an electronic communication to a third party.  
   
   
       12 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the identification of each decision-making entity includes a weighting factor and wherein the step of determining the cumulative support includes applying the weighting factor against each indicator of support for the decision.  
   
   
       13 . The method of  claim 6 , further comprising: 
 sending a communication to each of the plurality of decision-making entities stating an amount of additional support necessary to reach the minimum setpoint.    
   
   
       14 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the query responses include weighting factors or other criteria relevant to the level of support.  
   
   
       15 . The method of  claim 1  further comprising: 
 automatically communicating a second query to the plurality of decision-making entities if the additional support necessary to reach the minimum setpoint value is less than a second setpoint.    
   
   
       16 . The method of  claim 1 , further comprising: 
 querying one of the plurality of decision-making entities for authorization to implement the decision if the query responses provide cumulative support greater than the minimum setpoint.    
   
   
       17 . The method of  claim 1 , further comprising: 
 obtaining approval or denial to implement the decision.    
   
   
       18 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the cumulative support is less than the minimum setpoint, further comprising: 
 communicating the cumulative support to the plurality of decision-making entities;    communicating a second query describing a second proposed action, wherein the second proposed action is the same or different than the proposed action;    receiving responses to the second query from the plurality of decision-making entities, wherein each of the second responses include a revised indication of support;    determining a revised cumulative support for the second query incorporating the revised indications of support; and    automatically implementing the second proposed action if the revised cumulative support is greater than the minimum setpoint.    
   
   
       19 . A computer program product including instructions embodied on a computer readable medium, the instructions comprising: 
 maintaining instructions for maintaining identification for a plurality of decision-making entities in a memory device, wherein the decision making entities are individuals, families, groups, employees, employers or combinations thereof;    maintaining instructions for maintaining a setpoint representing a minimum cumulative support required for a computer to automatically implement a proposed action;    communicating instructions for communicating a query to the plurality of decision-making entities, wherein the query includes a description of the proposed action;    receiving instructions for receiving responses to the query from the plurality of decision-making entities, wherein each response includes an indicator of support for the proposed action;    determining instructions for determining the cumulative support from the query responses received; and    implementing instructions for automatically implementing the decision if the cumulative support is greater than the setpoint.    
   
   
       20 . The computer program product of  claim 19 , further comprising: 
 communicating instructions for communicating messages to one or more of the decision-making entities.    
   
   
       21 . The computer program product of  claim 19 , further comprising: 
 communicating instructions for communicating messages from one or more of the decision-making entities to at least one different decision-making entity.    
   
   
       22 . The computer program product of  claim 19 , further comprising instructions for formulating a decision of a type selected from qualitative, quantitative functional or a combination of decisions thereof.  
   
   
       23 . The computer program product of  claim 19 , wherein the implementing instructions include transmitting instructions for transmitting an instruction to one or more trading networks.  
   
   
       24 . The computer program product of  claim 19 , further comprising: 
 arbitration instructions imposing arbitration among the plurality of decision-making entities if the query responses provide cumulative support less than the minimum setpoint.    
   
   
       25 . The of  claim 19 , further comprising 
 caucusing instructions for initiating an intra-group caucus between a plurality of the decision-making entities.    
   
   
       26 . The computer program product of  claim 19 , further comprising: 
 initiating instructions for allowing one of the decision-making entity to initiate a query.    
   
   
       27 . The computer program product of  claim 19 , further comprising: 
 identifying instructions for identifying a query that is formulated by one of the plurality of decision-making entities; and    transmitting instructions for transmitting the query to the plurality of decision-making entities.    
   
   
       28 . The computer program product of  claim 27 , further comprising: 
 identifying instructions for identifying a setpoint established by the decision-making entity that formulated the query.    
   
   
       29 . The computer program product of  claim 19 , wherein the implementing instructions for implementing the decision comprise transmitting instructions for transmitting an electronic communication to a third party.  
   
   
       30 . The computer program product of  claim 19 , further comprising: 
 maintaining instructions for maintaining a weighting factor for each of the decision-making entities; and    applying instructions for applying the weighting factor for each of the decision-making entities against the indication of support received from the corresponding decision-making entity.    
   
   
       31 . The computer program product of  claim 24 , further comprising: 
 transmitting instructions for transmitting to each of the plurality of decision-making entities an amount of additional support necessary to reach the minimum setpoint value.    
   
   
       32 . The computer program product of  claim 19 , wherein the indication of support provides a graduated level of support.  
   
   
       33 . The computer program product of  claim 19 , further comprising: 
 transmitting instructions for automatically communicating a second query to the plurality of decision-making entities if the additional support necessary to reach the minimum setpoint is less than an second setpoint.    
   
   
       34 . The computer program product of  claim 19 , further comprising: 
 generating instructions for generating a query to one of the plurality of decision-making entities for authorization to implement the decision if the query responses provide cumulative support greater than the minimum setpoint.    
   
   
       35 . The computer program product of  claim 19 , wherein the cumulative support is less than the minimum setpoint, further comprising: 
 transmitting instructions for communicating the cumulative response to the plurality of decision-making entities;    transmitting instructions for communicating a second query describing a second proposed action, wherein the second proposed action is the same or different than the proposed action;    transmitting instructions for communicating second responses from the plurality of decision-making entities, wherein the second responses comprise a revised indication of support;    determining instructions for determining a revised cumulative response to the second query incorporating the revised indication of support;    implementing instructions for automatically implementing the second proposed action if the revised cumulative response is greater than the minimum setpoint value.    
   
   
       36 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein one or more of the plurality of decision-making entities communicates through a personal digital assistant.  
   
   
       37 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the communications occur over a wireless network.  
   
   
       38 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the communications utilize instant messaging.  
   
   
       39 . The method of  claim 1 , further comprising: 
 providing a collaboration manager to interface between decision-making entities having different computer platforms or applications.

Cited by (0)

No later patents cite this yet.

References (0)

No backward citations on record.