Universal x-ray test bed

Abstract

Systems and methods presented herein provide for the testing and reconfiguration of x-ray devices. In one embodiment, a test bed effectuates testing of an acquired x-ray device to determine a cause of the inoperability of the device. The x-ray device test bed may be provided to test a plurality of x-ray devices and, therefore, readily adaptable to such devices. The x-ray device test bed may include a mount for an x-ray tube. A variable power supply may be coupled to the x-ray tube to provide the requisite high-voltage electrical energy thereto. The x-ray device test bed may also include a mount for an imaging module (e.g., a “flat-panel sensor”). A processor may be coupled to the imaging module to determine the operational characteristics thereof. If certain x-ray components are deemed inoperable, the x-ray components may be replaced such that the x-ray device may be reintroduced to a medical industry segment.

1 . A test bed for use with a plurality of x-ray device types, including:
 a housing that includes a first support member and a second support member, wherein the first support member is configured for retaining an x-ray tube and wherein the second support member is configured for retaining an imaging module of the plurality of x-ray device types;   a high-voltage power supply configured for selectively providing a plurality of voltage levels and for being adapted to provide at least one of the voltage levels to the x-ray tube; and   a processor communicatively coupled to the imaging module to retrieve electronic data from the imaging module where in the processor processes the electronic data to determine at least one inoperable component of the imaging module.   
     
     
         2 . The test bed of  claim 1 , wherein the first support member is further configured for retaining the x-ray tube of the plurality of x-ray device types. 
     
     
         3 . The test bed of  claim 2 , wherein a first x-ray device of the plurality of x-ray device types is manufactured by a first x-ray device manufacturer and a second x-ray device of the plurality of x-ray device types is manufactured by a second x-ray device manufacturer that is different from the first x-ray device manufacturer. 
     
     
         4 . The test bed of  claim 1 , further including a storage element that stores a first software module, wherein the first software module directs the processor to generate a report that includes information associated with at least one inoperable pixel of the imaging module. 
     
     
         5 . The test bed of  claim 4 , wherein the storage element further stores a second software module that controls a rules processing engine, wherein the rules processing engine is configured for receiving the information associated with the least one inoperable pixel of the imaging module to determine a requisite compliance. 
     
     
         6 . The test bed of  claim 5 , wherein the requisite compliance includes a standard, a government regulation, or both. 
     
     
         7 . The test bed of  claim 1 , further including a display interface configured for displaying an image produced by operable pixels of the imaging module. 
     
     
         8 . The test bed of  claim 7 , further including a storage element stores a software module, wherein the software module directs the processor to display a location of at least one inoperable pixel with the display interface. 
     
     
         9 . The test bed of  claim 1 , further including a storage element that stores a software module, wherein the software module directs the processor to locate the least one inoperable pixel of the charge coupled device. 
     
     
         10 . The test bed of  claim 1 , further including a storage element that stores a software module, wherein the software module determines the percentage of operable pixels within the imaging module. 
     
     
         11 . Test bed of  claim 1 , further including a storage element that stores a software module, wherein the software module determines a failure rate for the pixels of the imaging module. 
     
     
         12 . A method of reconfiguring a plurality of x-ray device types, including:
 identifying a first x-ray device of a medical industry segment, wherein the first x-ray device is at least partially inoperable;   acquiring the first x-ray device from the medical industry segment;   providing a test bed that adapts to a configuration of the first x-ray device;   operating the test bed to determine at least one inoperable component of the first x-ray device; and   replacing or repairing me the at least one inoperable component to return the first x-ray device to an operable status.   
     
     
         13 . The method of  claim 12 , wherein operating the test bed includes accessing a database that stores information associated with a second x-ray device to determine the least one inoperable component of the first x-ray device, wherein the first x-ray device and the second x-ray device include a same type. 
     
     
         14 . The method of  claim 12 , further including storing information, in a database, of at least a portion of the first x-ray device in response to operating the test bed. 
     
     
         15 . The method of  claim 14 , further including:
 identifying a second x-ray device of a medical industry segment, wherein the second x-ray device is at least partially inoperable;   acquiring the second x-ray device from the medical industry segment;   providing a test bed that adapts to a configuration of the second x-ray device;   operating the test bed to determine at least one inoperable component of the second x-ray device; and   replacing or repairing the at least one inoperable component to return the second x-ray device to an operable status.   
     
     
         16 . The method of  claim 15 , further including storing information, in the database, of at least a portion of the second x-ray device in response to operating the test bed for the second x-ray device. 
     
     
         17 . The method of  claim 16 , further including mapping the information of the second x-ray device to the information of the first x-ray device. 
     
     
         18 . The method of  claim 16 , wherein storing the information of the first and second x-ray devices includes storing the information according to manufacturer, wherein the first and second x-ray devices are different. 
     
     
         19 . The method of  claim 16 , wherein the storing the information of the first and second x-ray devices includes storing the information according to type, wherein the first and second x-ray devices are different. 
     
     
         20 . A system for analyzing flat panel sensors of x-ray devices to determine operational characteristics of the flat panel sensors, including
 a radiant energy source;   a high voltage source coupled to the radiant energy source stimulate emission of radiant energy from the radiant energy source;   a communication interface configured for adaptively coupling to a plurality of flat panel sensors;   a processor communicatively coupled to the communication interface to determine a type of flat panel sensor coupled to the communication interface and to process data from the flat panel sensor for use in determining one or more inoperable components of the flat panel sensor.   
     
     
         21 . A method of determining an operational characteristic of a flat-panel sensor of an x-ray device, including:
 providing a test bed that includes a communication interface configured for coupling to a plurality flat-panel sensors;   generating a plurality of control signals to interrogate connections between a first flat-panel sensor and the communication interface;   determining, based on the interrogate connections, a type of the first flat-panel sensor;   propagating energy to the first flat-panel sensor;   extracting data from the first flat-panel sensor in response to propagating energy; and   processing the extracted data to determine one or more inoperable components configured with the first flat-panel sensor.   
     
     
         22 . The method of  claim 21 , further including:
 coupling a second flat-panel sensor to the communication interface;   generating a plurality of control signals to interrogate connections between the second flat-panel sensor and the communication interface;   determining, based on the interrogate connections, a type of the second flat-panel sensor;   propagating energy to the second flat-panel sensor;   extracting data from the second flat-panel sensor in response to propagating energy; and   processing the extracted data to determine one or more inoperable components configured with the second flat-panel sensor.   
     
     
         23 . The method of  claim 22 , further including accessing a database to retrieve information about the first flat-panel sensor for comparison to information about the second flat-panel sensor. 
     
     
         24 . The method of  claim 23 , using the comparison of the information about the first flat-panel sensor to the information about the second flat-panel sensor to determine the one or more inoperable components configured with the second flat-panel sensor. 
     
     
         25 . The method of  claim 21 , further including determining a percentage of operable pixels with the first flat-panel sensor. 
     
     
         26 . The method of  claim 25 , determining a failure rate of pixels with the first flat-panel sensor.