US2013158963A1PendingUtilityA1

Systems and methods for improving visual attention models

Assignee: BROOKS BRIAN EPriority: Jul 7, 2010Filed: Jun 27, 2011Published: Jun 20, 2013
Est. expiryJul 7, 2030(~4 yrs left)· nominal 20-yr term from priority
G06V 10/451G06F 30/20G06T 7/11G06T 2207/30201G06T 2207/10024G06F 17/5009
45
PatentIndex Score
0
Cited by
0
References
0
Claims

Abstract

Systems and methods for improving visual attention models use effectiveness assessment from an environment as feedback to improve visual attention models. The effectiveness assessment uses data indicative of a particular behavior, which is related to visual attention allocation, received from the environment to assess relative effectiveness of the environment on influencing the particular behavior.

Claims

exact text as granted — not AI-modified
1 . A method of evaluating a visual attention model, comprising:
 receiving visual representations of at least a portion of two environments that differ from each other on a visual dimension;   receiving output generated by applying the visual attention model on the visual representations of the at least a portion of the two environments;   assessing the relative effectiveness of the two environments on influencing a particular human behavior based on data indicative of the particular human behavior received from the two environments, wherein the particular human behavior is inferentially related to attention allocation; and   comparing the assessed relative effectiveness to the output generated by the visual attention model.   
     
     
         2 . The method of  claim 1 , further comprising modifying the visual attention model when the assessed relative effectiveness is inconsistent with the output generated by the visual attention model. 
     
     
         3 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the particular human behavior is indirectly inferentially related to attention allocation. 
     
     
         4 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the data indicative of the particular human behavior comprises at least one of point-of-sale data and motion sensor data. 
     
     
         5 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the output generated by the visual attention model comprises at least one of a saliency map, relative saliency numbers, sequence numbers, probability of a region being attended within a given time period, and length of time to which a region is attended. 
     
     
         6 . The method of  claim 1 , further comprising selecting two environments with similar output generated by the visual attention model on the visual representations of the at least of a portion of two environments. 
     
     
         7 . (canceled) 
     
     
         8 . The method of  claim 2 , wherein the visual dimension is represented in the visual attention model, and wherein modifying the visual attention model comprises modifying a parameter of the visual attention model related to the visual dimension. 
     
     
         9 . The method of  claim 8 , wherein modifying a parameter of the visual attention model comprises modifying a weight factor for the visual dimension represented in the visual attention model. 
     
     
         10 - 14 . (canceled) 
     
     
         15 . A visual attention model improvement system, comprising:
 a module for receiving visual representations of at least a portion of two environments that differ from each other on a visual dimension;   a module for receiving output generated by applying the visual attention model on the visual representations of the at least a portion of the two environments;   a module for assessing the relative effectiveness of the two environments on influencing a particular human behavior based on data indicative of the particular human behavior received from the two environments, wherein the particular human behavior is inferentially related to attention allocation; and   a processing unit for comparing the assessed relative effectiveness to the output generated by the visual attention model.   
     
     
         16 . The system of  claim 15 , wherein the processing unit modifies the visual attention model when the assessed relative effectiveness is inconsistent with the output generated by the visual attention model. 
     
     
         17 . The system of  claim 15 , wherein the particular human behavior is indirectly inferentially related to attention allocation. 
     
     
         18 - 20 . (canceled) 
     
     
         21 . The system of  claim 16 , wherein the visual dimension is represented in the visual attention model. 
     
     
         22 . The system of  claim 21 , wherein modifying the visual attention model comprises modifying a parameter of the visual attention model related to the visual dimension. 
     
     
         23 . The system of  claim 22 , wherein modifying a parameter of the visual attention model comprises modifying a weight factor for the visual dimension represented in the visual attention model. 
     
     
         24 . The system of  claim 16 , wherein modifying the visual attention model comprises adding a parameter related to the visual dimension to the visual attention model. 
     
     
         25 . The system of  claim 15 , wherein the visual dimension comprises at least one of color, luminance, orientation, font, edges, motion, faces, intensity, distance from fovea, spatial bias, prior-knowledge influence, and task-based influence. 
     
     
         26 - 28 . (canceled) 
     
     
         29 . A visual attention model improvement system, comprising:
 a module for receiving visual representation of at least a portion of an environment;   a module for receiving output generated by applying the visual attention model on the visual representation of the at least a portion of the environment;   a module for assessing the relative effectiveness of the environment on influencing the particular human behavior based on data indicative of a particular human behavior received from the environment, wherein the particular human behavior is inferentially related to attention allocation; and   a processing unit for comparing the assessed relative effectiveness to the output generated by the visual attention model.   
     
     
         30 . The system of  claim 29 , wherein the processing unit modifies the visual attention model when the assessed relative effectiveness is inconsistent with the output generated by the visual attention model. 
     
     
         31 . The system of  claim 29 , wherein the environment is an environment having a sign. 
     
     
         32 . (canceled)

Join the waitlist — get patent alerts

Track US2013158963A1 — get alerts on status changes and closely related new filings.

We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.