US2013182922A1PendingUtilityA1

Interactive and automated tissue image analysis with global training database and variable-abstraction processing in cytological specimen classification and laser capture microdissection applications

Assignee: LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPPriority: Sep 13, 2002Filed: Nov 30, 2012Published: Jul 18, 2013
Est. expirySep 13, 2022(expired)· nominal 20-yr term from priority
Inventors:David H. Kil
G01N 1/06G06V 10/945G06V 10/771G06V 20/698G06F 18/211G06F 18/40G06V 20/69G06V 20/695G06T 7/00G06T 2207/10056G06T 7/0012G01N 2001/284G06T 2207/20132G06T 2207/30024G06T 7/11G01N 1/30G02B 21/365G06T 7/143G06K 9/00147G01N 15/1433
60
PatentIndex Score
0
Cited by
0
References
0
Claims

Abstract

A system and method for performing tissue image analysis and region of interest identification for further processing applications such as laser capture microdissection is provided. The invention provides three-stage processing with flexible state transition that allows image recognition to be performed at an appropriate level of abstraction. The three stages include processing at one or more than one of the pixel, subimage and object levels of processing. Also, the invention provides both an interactive mode and a high-throughput batch mode which employs training files generated automatically.

Claims

exact text as granted — not AI-modified
1 - 18 . (canceled) 
     
     
         19 . A computer-implemented method for image analysis, the computer-implemented method comprising:
 receiving a first image;   transforming the first image into a feature space;   selecting a level of abstraction;   selecting a database containing parameters based on the selected level of abstraction;   classifying the first image into regions of interest employing the parameters from the database based on the selected level of abstraction;   updating the parameters of the database for the level of abstraction with data from the first image;   receiving a second image;   transforming the second image into a feature space;   classifying the second image into regions of interest employing the updated parameters from the database based on the selected level of abstraction;   updating the parameters of the database with data from the second image.   
     
     
         20 . The computer-implemented method for image analysis of  claim 19  wherein selecting the level of abstraction includes selecting pixel processing. 
     
     
         21 . The computer-implemented method for image analysis of  claim 20  further including transmitting the regions of interest obtained from pixel processing for laser capture microdissection. 
     
     
         22 . The computer-implemented method for image analysis of  claim 19  wherein selecting the level of abstraction includes selecting subimage processing. 
     
     
         23 . The computer-implemented method for image analysis of  claim 22  wherein classifying the first image includes classifying the first image into regions of interest employing parameters from the database for pixel processing and classifying the first image into regions of interest employing parameters from the database for subimage processing; and wherein classifying the second image includes classifying the second image into regions of interest employing parameters from the database for pixel processing and classifying the second image into regions of interest employing parameters from the database for subimage processing. 
     
     
         24 . The computer-implemented method for image analysis of  claim 23  further including transmitting the regions of interest obtained from subimage processing for laser capture microdissection. 
     
     
         25 . The computer-implemented method for image analysis of  claim 19  wherein selecting the level of abstraction includes selecting object processing. 
     
     
         26 . The computer-implemented method for image analysis of  claim 25  wherein classifying the first image includes classifying the first image into regions of interest employing parameters from the database for pixel processing and classifying the first image into regions of interest employing parameters from the database for subimage processing and classifying the first image into regions of interest employing parameters from the database for object processing; and wherein classifying, the second image includes classifying the second image into regions of interest employing parameters from the database for pixel processing and classifying the second image into regions of interest employing parameters from the database for subimage processing and classifying the second image into regions of interest employing parameters from the database for object processing. 
     
     
         27 . The computer-implemented method for image analysis of  claim 26  further including transmitting the regions of interest obtained from object processing for laser capture microdissection. 
     
     
         28 . The computer-implemented method for image analysis of  claim 25  wherein classifying the first image includes classifying the first image into regions of interest employing parameters from the database for pixel processing and classifying the first image into regions of interest employing parameters from the database for object processing; and wherein classifying the second image includes classifying the second image into regions of interest employing parameters from the database for pixel processing and classifying the second image into regions of interest employing parameters from the database for object processing. 
     
     
         29 . The computer-implemented method for image analysis of  claim 28  further including transmitting the regions of interest obtained from object processing for laser capture microdissection.

Join the waitlist — get patent alerts

Track US2013182922A1 — get alerts on status changes and closely related new filings.

We store only your email — no account needed. See our privacy policy.