US2013191689A1PendingUtilityA1

Functional testing of a processor design

41
Assignee: ALMOG ELIPriority: Jan 20, 2012Filed: Jan 20, 2012Published: Jul 25, 2013
Est. expiryJan 20, 2032(~5.5 yrs left)· nominal 20-yr term from priority
G06F 11/2236G06F 30/30
41
PatentIndex Score
0
Cited by
0
References
0
Claims

Abstract

According to exemplary embodiments, a computer implemented method for functional testing of a processor design includes accessing a test template from a library of test templates, wherein the test template is configured to test a first selected function of the processor and inputting the test template to an automated test generation tool executed by a computer. The method further includes generating an instruction sequence based on the test template by the automated test generation tool and injecting an event instruction to the instruction sequence during the generating of the instruction sequence by the automated test generation tool, the injecting of the event instruction preserving testing of the first selected function of the processor and the event instruction being configured to test a second selected function of the processor. The method includes verifying a function of the processor by analyzing responses of the processor to the instruction sequence.

Claims

exact text as granted — not AI-modified
1 . A computer program product for functional testing of a processor design, the computer program product comprising:
 a tangible storage medium readable by a processing circuit and storing instructions for execution by the processing circuit for performing a method comprising:   accessing a test template from a library of test templates, wherein the test template is configured to test a first selected function of the processor;   inputting the test template to an automated test generation tool executed by a computer;   generating an instruction sequence based on the test template by the automated test generation tool;   injecting an event instruction to the instruction sequence during the generating of the instruction sequence by the automated test generation tool, the injecting of the event instruction preserving testing of the first selected function of the processor and the event instruction being configured to test a second selected function of the processor; and   verifying a function of the processor by analyzing responses of the processor to the instruction sequence.   
     
     
         2 . The computer program product of  claim 1 , wherein the functional testing of the processor design is performed using a simulated design of the processor. 
     
     
         3 . The computer program product of  claim 1 , wherein accessing the test template comprises accessing the test template that includes control statements that restrict the injecting of the event instruction into the the instruction sequence. 
     
     
         4 . The computer program product of  claim 3 , wherein the control statements define a first portion of the test template that allow injecting of the event instruction and a second portion of the test template that blocks injecting of the event instruction. 
     
     
         5 . The computer program product of  claim 1 , wherein injecting the event instruction comprises access the event instruction from a repository of event instructions. 
     
     
         6 . The computer program product of  claim 5 , comprising organizing the repository of event instructions by a characteristic of each event instruction and selecting the event instruction based on the characteristic and a control statement in the test template. 
     
     
         7 . The computer program product of  claim 1 , wherein the second selected function is different than the first selected function tested by the test template. 
     
     
         8 . A computer implemented method for functional testing of a processor design, the method comprising:
 accessing a test template from a library of test templates, wherein the test template is configured to test a first selected function of the processor;   inputting the test template to an automated test generation tool executed by a computer;   generating an instruction sequence based on the test template by the automated test generation tool;   injecting an event instruction to the instruction sequence during the generating of the instruction sequence by the automated test generation tool, the injecting of the event instruction preserving testing of the first selected function of the processor and the event instruction being configured to test a second selected function of the processor; and   verifying a function of the processor by analyzing responses of the processor to the instruction sequence.   
     
     
         9 . The method of  claim 8 , wherein the functional testing of the processor design is performed using a simulated design of the processor. 
     
     
         10 . The method of  claim 8 , wherein accessing the test template comprises accessing the test template that includes control statements that restrict the injecting of the event instruction into the the instruction sequence. 
     
     
         11 . The method of  claim 10 , wherein the control statements define a first portion of the test template that allow injecting of the event instruction and a second portion of the test template that blocks injecting of the event instruction. 
     
     
         12 . The method of  claim 8 , wherein injecting the event instruction comprises access the event instruction from a repository of event instructions. 
     
     
         13 . The method of  claim 12 , comprising organizing the repository of event instructions by a characteristic of each event instruction and selecting the event instruction based on the characteristic and a control statement in the test template. 
     
     
         14 . The method of  claim 8 , wherein the second selected function is different than the first selected function tested by the test template. 
     
     
         15 . A system for functional testing of a processor design, the system comprising:
 a computer, the system configured to perform a method comprising:   accessing a test template from a library of test templates, wherein the test template is configured to test a first selected function of the processor;   inputting the test template to an automated test generation tool executed by a computer;   generating an instruction sequence based on the test template by the automated test generation tool;   injecting an event instruction to the instruction sequence during the generating of the instruction sequence by the automated test generation tool, the injecting of the event instruction preserving testing of the first selected function of the processor and the event instruction being configured to test a second selected function of the processor; and   verifying a function of the processor by analyzing responses of the processor to the instruction sequence.   
     
     
         16 . The system of  claim 15 , wherein the functional testing of the processor design is performed using a simulated design of the processor. 
     
     
         17 . The system of  claim 15 , wherein accessing the test template comprises accessing the test template that includes control statements that restrict the injecting of the event instruction into the the instruction sequence. 
     
     
         18 . The system of  claim 17 , wherein the control statements define a first portion of the test template that allow injecting of the event instruction and a second portion of the test template that blocks injecting of the event instruction. 
     
     
         19 . The system of  claim 15 , wherein injecting the event instruction comprises access the event instruction from a repository of event instructions. 
     
     
         20 . The system of  claim 19 , comprising organizing the repository of event instructions by a characteristic of each event instruction and selecting the event instruction based on the characteristic and a control statement in the test template.

Cited by (0)

No later patents cite this yet.

References (0)

No backward citations on record.