US2019061535A1PendingUtilityA1

Electric vehicle power management systems

53
Assignee: GRIDPOINT INCPriority: Mar 31, 2009Filed: Mar 20, 2018Published: Feb 28, 2019
Est. expiryMar 31, 2029(~2.7 yrs left)· nominal 20-yr term from priority
B60L 53/18B60L 53/68B60L 53/63H02J 3/381Y04S30/14B60L 53/65B60L 55/00Y04S10/126B60L 53/665B60L 2240/70Y02T90/14Y02T90/16B60L 53/64H02J 7/00Y02T10/7072H02J 2101/10B60L 11/1844Y02T90/128Y02T90/121Y02T10/7005B60L 11/1846B60L 11/1842Y10T307/477Y02E60/721Y02T10/7088Y02T10/7291B60L 11/1816Y10T307/642B60L 11/1824Y10T307/406Y02T90/169B60L 11/184B60L 2230/16H02J 7/0052B60L 11/1848Y02T90/163G05D 29/00Y04S30/12Y02E60/00Y02T90/167Y02T90/12Y02T10/72Y02T10/70B60L 53/305
53
PatentIndex Score
0
Cited by
0
References
0
Claims

Abstract

A system that enables power flow management for electrical devices, such as electric vehicles. Power flow managers can coordinate charging activities. Power flow decisions may be based on site-level information. Power flow management strategies may be optimized. Power spikes may be avoided by using safe failure modes. Generation stacks may be used for reducing cost. AGC commands are used to control power resources. Power regulation are apportioned to power resources, and power regulation ranges may be determined. Power flow strategies are implemented in response to changes in intermittent power flow. Locations of devices may be determined using network fingerprints. Power flow measurements are determined, and AC power flows are inferred from DC power flows. Network traffic consumption are minimized. Communication protocols are translated. Enhanced vehicle communications are provided that communicate to vehicle subsystems, that arbitrate smart charge points, and that use existing hardware, non-specific hardware, or control extensibility systems.

Claims

exact text as granted — not AI-modified
1 . A method for managing an electric vehicle charging network, the method comprising:
 communicating a first charging behavior from a central flow controller to a plurality of electric vehicles;   controlling power flow between each of a plurality of charging stations and their corresponding electric vehicles according to the first charging behavior;   detecting a communications failure between the central flow controller and one or more of the plurality of electric vehicles; and   controlling, in response to detecting the communications failure, power flow between (i) one or more of the plurality of charging stations experiencing the communications failure and (ii) their corresponding electric vehicles according to the second charging behavior during the period of time of the communications failure, wherein the second charging behavior is predictable.   
     
     
         2 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the second charging behavior comprises:
 maintaining the first charging behavior for a predefined period of time; and   transitioning to a predefined autonomous charging strategy after the predefined period of time.   
     
     
         3 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the second charging behavior comprises:
 limiting the power flow to each of the plurality of electric vehicles to a value calculated to allow the plurality of electric vehicles to charge at combined maximum power draw of the electrical circuit supplying power to the plurality of charging stations.   
     
     
         4 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the second charging behavior comprises:
 executing charging behavior state transitions for each of the plurality of electric vehicles, the charging state behavior state transitions occurring at random offset times after the detection of the communications failure.   
     
     
         5 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the second charging behavior comprises:
 executing charging behavior state transitions for each of the plurality of electric vehicles, the charging behavior state transitions occurring at random offset times after the detection of the communications failure,   wherein electric vehicles of the plurality of electric vehicles that are not being charged at the time of the detected communications failure wait a random amount of time before initiating charging, and   wherein electric vehicles of the plurality of electric vehicles that are being charged at the time of the detected communications failure wait a random amount of time before terminating charging.   
     
     
         6 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the second charging behavior comprises:
 controlling power flow of each of the plurality of electric vehicles detecting the communications failure according to a predefined power curve stored in each of the plurality of electric vehicles and in the central flow controller;   determining, by the flow controller, appropriate charging behaviors for each of the plurality of electric vehicles that are not experiencing the communications failure based on the predefined power curve stored in each of the plurality of electric vehicles that are experiencing the communications failure; and   communicating the appropriate charging behaviors from the central flow controller to the plurality of electric vehicles that are not experiencing the communications failure.   
     
     
         7 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the second charging behavior comprises:
 predicting the connection and disconnection of other of the plurality of electric vehicles to and from the plurality of charging stations, and controlling power flow based on those predictions.   
     
     
         8 . A computer program product for managing an electric vehicle charging network, the product comprising:
 a computer usable medium having computer readable program code embodied in the computer usable medium for causing an application program to execute on a computer system, the computer readable program code means comprising:
 computer readable program code for communicating a first charging behavior from a central flow controller to a plurality of electric vehicles; 
 computer readable program code for controlling power flow between each of a plurality of charging stations and their corresponding electric vehicles according to the first charging behavior; 
 computer readable program code for detecting a communications failure between the central flow controller and the plurality of electric vehicles; and 
 computer readable program code for controlling, in response to detecting the communications failure, power flow between (i) one or more of a plurality of charging stations experience the communications failure and (ii) their corresponding electric vehicles according to the second charging behavior during the period of time of the communications failure, 
 wherein the second charging behavior is predictable. 
   
     
     
         9 . The computer program product of  claim 8 , wherein the computer readable program code for controlling power flow according to the second charging behavior comprises:
 computer readable program code for maintaining the first charging behavior for a predefined period of time; and   computer readable program code for transitioning to a predefined autonomous charging strategy after the predefined period of time.   
     
     
         10 . The computer program product of  claim 8 , wherein the computer readable program code for controlling power flow according to the second charging behavior comprises:
 computer readable program code for limiting the power flow to each of the plurality of electric vehicles to a value calculated to allow the plurality of electric vehicles to charge at combined maximum power draw of the electrical circuit supplying power to the plurality of charging stations.   
     
     
         11 . The computer program product of  claim 8 , wherein the computer readable program code for controlling power flow according to the second charging behavior comprises:
 computer readable program code for executing charging behavior state transitions for each of the plurality of electric vehicles, the charging behavior state transitions occurring at random offset times after the detection of the communications failure.   
     
     
         12 . The computer program product of  claim 8 , wherein the computer readable program code for controlling power flow according to the second charging behavior comprises:
 computer readable program code for executing charging behavior state transitions for each of the plurality of electric vehicles, the charging behavior state transitions occurring at random offset times after the detection of the communications failure,   wherein electric vehicles of the plurality of electric vehicles that are not being charged at the time of the detected communications failure wait a random amount of time before initiating charging, and   wherein electric vehicles of the plurality of electric vehicles that are being charged at the time of the detected communications failure wait a random amount of time before terminating charging.   
     
     
         13 . The computer program product of  claim 8 , further comprising:
 computer readable program code for controlling power flow of each of the plurality of electric vehicles detecting the communications failure according to a predefined curve stored in each of the plurality of electric vehicles and in the central flow controller;   computer readable program code for determining appropriate charging behaviors for each of the plurality of electric vehicles that are not experiencing the communications failure based on the predefined power curve stored in each of the plurality of electric vehicles that are experiencing the communications failure; and   computer readable program code for communicating the appropriate charging behaviors from the central flow controller to the plurality of electric vehicles that are not experiencing the communications failure.   
     
     
         14 . The computer program product of  claim 8 , wherein the computer readable program code for controlling power flow according to the second charging behavior comprises:
 computer readable program code for predicting the connection and disconnection of other of the plurality of electric vehicles to and from the plurality of charging stations, and controlling power flow based on those predictions.   
     
     
         15 . A system for managing an electric vehicle charging network, the system comprising:
 a central power flow controller communicatively coupled to a plurality of electric vehicles, the central power flow controller communicating a first charging behavior to the plurality of electric vehicles,   each of the plurality of electric vehicles including:
 a memory for storing a plurality of charging behaviors from the central flow controller; 
 a processor for controlling power flow between its associated electric vehicle and an associated charging station according to the first charging behavior of the plurality of charging behaviors received from the central flow controller; and 
 a communication interface for detecting a communications failure between the central flow controller and the electric vehicle, 
   wherein in response to detecting the communications failure, the processor controls power flow between (i) the associated charging station and (ii) the electric vehicle according to the second charging behavior during the period of time of the communications failure, and   wherein the second charging behavior is predictable.   
     
     
         16 . The system of  claim 15 , wherein the second charging behavior comprises:
 maintaining the first charging behavior for a predefined period of time; and   transitioning to a predefined autonomous charging strategy after the predefined period of time.   
     
     
         17 . The system of  claim 15  wherein the second charging behavior comprises:
 limiting the power flow to each of the plurality of electric vehicles to a value calculated to allow the plurality of electric vehicles to charge at combined maximum power draw of the electrical circuit supplying power to the plurality of charging stations. 
 
     
     
         18 . The system of  claim 15 , wherein the second charging behavior comprises:
 executing charging behavior state transitions for each of the plurality of electric vehicles, the charging behavior state transitions occurring at random offset times after the detection of the communications failure.   
     
     
         19 . The system of  claim 15 , wherein the second charging behavior comprises:
 executing charging behavior state transitions for each of the plurality of electric vehicles, the charging behavior state transitions occurring at random offset times after the detection of the communications failure,   wherein electric vehicles of the plurality of electric vehicles that are not being charged at the time of the detected communications failure wait a random amount of time before initiating charging, and   wherein electric vehicles of the plurality of electric vehicles that are being charged at the time of the detected communications failure wait a random amount of time before terminating charging.   
     
     
         20 . The system of  claim 15 , wherein the second charging behavior includes controlling power flow of each of the plurality of electric vehicles detecting the communications failure according to a predefined power curve stored in each of the plurality of electric vehicles and in the flow controller, and the flow controller determines appropriate charging behaviors for each of the plurality of electric vehicles that are not experiencing the communications failure based on the predefined power curve stored in each of the plurality of electric vehicles that are experiencing the communications failure, and communicates the appropriate charging behaviors to the plurality of electric vehicles that are not experiencing the communications failure. 
     
     
         21 . The system of  claim 15 , wherein the second charging behavior includes predicting the connection and disconnection of other of the plurality of electric vehicles to and from the plurality of charging stations, and controlling power flow based on those predictions.

Cited by (0)

No later patents cite this yet.

References (0)

No backward citations on record.