US2019369068A1PendingUtilityA1
Software for microfluidic systems interfacing with mass spectrometry
Est. expiryMay 31, 2038(~11.9 yrs left)· nominal 20-yr term from priority
G01N 30/7266G01N 27/447G01N 27/44795G05F 1/10H01J 49/165G01N 27/44713G01P 5/22G01N 2030/8831G01N 30/86G01N 30/8631G01N 30/6078G01N 27/44791H01J 49/147G01N 30/8624G01N 27/4473B01L 2400/0415B01L 2300/0838B01L 2200/0647B01L 3/502792B01L 3/502761B01L 3/502715G01N 30/6095
65
PatentIndex Score
0
Cited by
0
References
0
Claims
Abstract
Methods, devices, and systems for improving the quality of electrospray ionization mass spectrometer (ESI-MS) data are described, as are methods, devices, and systems for achieving improved correlation between chemical separation data and mass spectrometry data.
Claims
exact text as granted — not AI-modified1 .- 17 . (canceled)
18 . A method comprising:
a) providing a sample comprising a mixture of two or more analytes; b) performing a separation within a fluid channel containing the sample to resolve individual analyte peaks from the mixture of two or more analytes; c) calculating a velocity of an analyte peak upon mobilization of the fluid channel's contents towards a fluid channel exit; and d) using the velocity of the analyte peak to determine a time at which the analyte peak reaches the fluid channel exit.
19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the fluid channel is a lumen of a capillary.
20 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the fluid channel is part of a microfluidic device.
21 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the separation is based on isoelectric focusing (IEF), capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE), capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE), capillary isotachophoresis (CITP), or micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC).
22 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the velocity of the analyte peak is calculated from a time interval required for the analyte peak to move from a first position to a second position.
23 . The method of claim 22 , wherein the first position, second position, and time interval are determined from a series of two or more images of the fluid channel.
24 . The method of claim 23 , wherein the series of two or more images comprise ultraviolet light absorbance images, visible light absorbance images, or fluorescence images.
25 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the fluid channel exit comprises an electrospray interface with a mass spectrometer.
26 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the time at which the analyte peak reaches the fluid channel exit is used to correlate mass spectrometer data with the analyte peak.
27 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the mobilization of the fluid channel's contents comprises the use of an electroosmotic mobilization technique, a chemical mobilization technique, a hydrodynamic mobilization technique, or any combination thereof.
28 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the two or more analytes comprise proteins, protein-drug conjugates, peptides, nucleic acid molecules, carbohydrate molecules, lipid molecules, metabolite molecules, small organic compounds, or any combination thereof.
29 . The method of claim 26 , wherein a comparison of mass spectrometer data collected for samples of a biologic drug candidate and a reference drug is used to make a determination of biosimilarity.
30 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the velocity of the analyte peak is used in a feedback loop to adjust a control parameter for the separation or mobilization of the analyte peaks.
31 . The method of claim 30 , wherein the control parameter is a voltage.
32 . The method of claim 30 , wherein the feedback loop operates at a frequency of at least 0.1 Hz.
33 .- 62 . (canceled)
63 . A computer-implemented method comprising:
a) receiving, using a processor, image data comprising two or more images acquired using a detector configured to image all or a portion of a separation channel in a capillary or a microfluidic device; b) processing the image data using the same or a different processor to determine a position of an analyte peak within the separation channel in the two or more images; c) calculating, using the same or a different processor, a velocity of the analyte peak based on the position of the analyte peak in the two or more images and a known time interval between acquisition of the two or more images; and d) determining, using the same or a different processor, a time at which the analyte peak will reach a separation channel outlet.
64 . The computer-implemented method of claim 63 , wherein a separation reaction performed within the separation channel comprises isoelectric focusing (IEF), capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE), capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE), capillary isotachophoresis (CITP), or micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC).
65 . The computer-implemented method of claim 63 , wherein the two or more images comprise ultraviolet light absorbance images, visible light absorbance images, or fluorescence images.
66 . The computer-implemented method of claim 63 , wherein the separation channel outlet is in fluid communication with or comprises an electrospray interface with a mass spectrometer.
67 . The computer-implemented method of claim 63 , wherein the time at which the analyte peak reaches the separation channel outlet is used to correlate mass spectrometer data with the analyte peak.
68 . The computer-implemented method of claim 63 , wherein the analyte is separated from a mixture and comprises a protein, a protein-drug conjugate, a peptide, a nucleic acid molecule, a carbohydrate molecule, a lipid molecule, a metabolite molecule, or a small organic compound.
69 . The computer-implemented method of claim 63 , wherein a comparison of mass spectrometer data collected for samples of a biologic drug candidate and a reference drug is used to make a determination of biosimilarity.
70 . The computer-implemented method of claim 63 , wherein the velocity of the analyte peak is used in a feedback loop to adjust a control parameter for a separation reaction performed in the separation channel.
71 . The computer-implemented method of claim 70 , wherein the control parameter is a voltage.
72 . The computer-implemented method of claim 70 , wherein the feedback loop operates at a frequency of at least 0.1 Hz.Cited by (0)
No later patents cite this yet.
References (0)
No backward citations on record.