US2021392893A1PendingUtilityA1

Synergistic Fungicidal Mixtures and Compositions Comprising 5-Fluoro-4-Imino-3-Methyl-1-Tosyl-3,4-Dihydropyrimidin-2(1h)-One for Fungal Control (SBI)

85
Assignee: ADAMA MAKHTESHIM LTDPriority: Dec 31, 2013Filed: Sep 3, 2021Published: Dec 23, 2021
Est. expiryDec 31, 2033(~7.5 yrs left)· nominal 20-yr term from priority
A01N 43/88A01N 47/14A01N 37/50A01N 43/653A01N 37/34A01N 47/08A01N 43/54A01N 47/24A01N 43/40A01N 45/02A01N 43/56A01N 47/04
85
PatentIndex Score
0
Cited by
0
References
0
Claims

Abstract

A fungicidal composition containing a fungicidally effective amount of the compound of Formula I:5-fluoro-4-imino-3-methyl-1-tosyl-3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-one, and at least one fungicide to provide synergistic control of selected fungi wherein the at least one fungicide is a fungicidal sterol biosynthesis-inhibitor.

Claims

exact text as granted — not AI-modified
What is claimed: 
     
         1 . A synergistic fungicidal mixture, comprising:
 a fungicidally effective amount of the compound of Formula I:   
       
         
           
           
               
               
           
         
       
       and
 at least one additional fungicide in which the at least one additional fungicide is a fungicidal sterol biosynthesis inhibitor. 
 
     
     
         2 . The mixture of  claim 1  in which the at least one additional fungicide is selected from the group consisting of epoxiconazole, cyproconazole, myclobutanil, metconazole, propiconazole, prothioconazole, fluquinconazole, flutriafol, and difenoconazole. 
     
     
         3 . The mixture of  claim 2  in which the concentration ratio of the Compound of Formula I to prothioconazole is between about 1:21.6 and about 2:1. 
     
     
         4 . The mixture of  claim 2  in which the concentration ratio of the Compound of Formula I to epoxiconazole is between about 3.6:1 and about 20:1. 
     
     
         5 . The mixture of  claim 2  in which the concentration ratio of the Compound of Formula I to cyproconazole is between about 1:3 and about 4.5:1. 
     
     
         6 . The mixture of  claim 2  in which the concentration ratio of the Compound of Formula I to myclobutanil is between about 1:27 and about 1:4. 
     
     
         7 . The mixture of  claim 2  in which the concentration ratio of the Compound of Formula I to metconazole is between about 2.2:1 and about 30:1. 
     
     
         8 . The mixture of  claim 2  in which the concentration ratio of the Compound of Formula I to difenoconazole is between about 120:1 and about 787:1. 
     
     
         9 . The mixture of  claim 2  in which the concentration ratio of the Compound of Formula I to propiconazole is between about 1:2.1 and about 30:1. 
     
     
         10 . The mixture of  claim 2  in which the concentration ratio of the Compound of Formula I to fluquinconazole is between about 1:1.3 and about 170:1. 
     
     
         11 . The mixture of  claim 2  in which the concentration ratio of the Compound of Formula I to flutriafol is between about 1:20.6 and about 5.1:1. 
     
     
         12 . The mixtures of  claims 1 - 11 , wherein the mixture provides control of a fungal pathogen and the fungal pathogen is one of Leaf Blotch of Wheat ( Mycosphaerella graminicola ; anamorph:  Septoria tritici ), Wheat Brown Rust ( Puccinia triticina ), Stripe Rust ( Puccinia striiformis  f. sp.  tritici ), Scab of Apple ( Venturia inaequalis ), Blister Smut of Maize ( Ustilago maydis ), Powdery Mildew of Grapevine ( Uncinula necator ), Barley scald ( Rhynchosporium secalis ), Blast of Rice ( Magnaporthe grisea ), Rust of Soybean ( Phakopsora pachyrhizi ), Glume Blotch of Wheat ( Leptosphaeria nodorum ), Powdery Mildew of Wheat ( Blumeria graminis  f. sp.  tritici ), Powdery Mildew of Barley ( Blumeria graminis  f. sp.  hordei ), Powdery Mildew of Cucurbits ( Erysiphe cichoracearum ), Anthracnose of Cucurbits ( Glomerella lagenarium ), Leaf Spot of Beet ( Cercospora beticola ), Early Blight of Tomato ( Alternaria solani ), and Net Blotch of Barley ( Pyrenophora teres ). 
     
     
         13 . The mixtures of  claims 1 - 11 , wherein the mixture provides control of a fungal pathogen and the fungal pathogen is Leaf Blotch of Wheat ( Mycosphaerella graminicola; anamorph: Septoria tritici ). 
     
     
         14 . The mixture of  claim 2 , wherein the mixture provides control of a fungal pathogen and the fungal pathogen is one of Leaf Blotch of Wheat ( Mycosphaerella graminicola; anamorph: Septoria tritici ), Wheat Brown Rust ( Puccinia triticina ), Stripe Rust ( Puccinia striiformis  f. sp.  tritici ), Scab of Apple ( Venturia inaequalis ), Blister Smut of Maize ( Ustilago maydis ), Powdery Mildew of Grapevine ( Uncinula necator ), Barley scald ( Rhynchosporium secalis ), Blast of Rice ( Magnaporthe grisea ), Rust of Soybean ( Phakopsora pachyrhizi ), Glume Blotch of Wheat ( Leptosphaeria nodorum ), Powdery Mildew of Wheat ( Blumeria graminis  f. sp.  tritici ), Powdery Mildew of Barley ( Blumeria graminis  f. sp.  hordei ), Powdery Mildew of Cucurbits ( Erysiphe cichoracearum ), Anthracnose of Cucurbits ( Glomerella lagenarium ), Leaf Spot of Beet ( Cercospora beticola ), Early Blight of Tomato ( Alternaria solani ), and Net Blotch of Barley ( Pyrenophora teres ). 
     
     
         15 . The mixture of  claim 2 , wherein the mixture provides control of a fungal pathogen and the fungal pathogen is Leaf Blotch of Wheat ( Mycosphaerella graminicola ; anamorph:  Septoria tritici ). 
     
     
         16 . A synergistic, fungicidal composition comprising a fungicidally effective amount of the mixtures of  claims 1 - 11  and an agriculturally acceptable adjuvant or carrier. 
     
     
         17 . The mixture of  claim 1  in which the at least one additional fungicide is prothioconazole. 
     
     
         18 . The mixture of  claim 1  in which the at least one additional fungicide is epoxiconazole.

Cited by (0)

No later patents cite this yet.

References (0)

No backward citations on record.