US2023187028A1PendingUtilityA1
Multi-omic assessment
Est. expiryMar 31, 2041(~14.7 yrs left)· nominal 20-yr term from priority
Inventors:Philip MaBruce WilcoxFrancois CollinChinmay BelthangadyMi YangManoj KhadkaManway LiuJohn BlumeRobert S. Langer, Jr.Ehdieh Khaledian
G01N 2570/00G16H 50/20G16H 50/70G16H 20/10G16H 20/40G16H 10/40G01N 33/5432G16H 30/40G16H 30/20G01N 33/587G01N 33/6848G01N 33/54346G16H 15/00G16B 40/00G16B 25/10G01N 33/57585G01N 33/57557G16B 20/20G16B 40/30G16B 20/00G16B 40/20
75
PatentIndex Score
0
Cited by
0
References
0
Claims
Abstract
Described herein are methods such as multi-omic methods for assessing a disease such as cancer. The multi-omic methods may integrate proteomic, transcriptomic, genomic, lipidomic, or metabolomic data. The method screening diseases or disease states. Also described herein are methods for screening for diseases or disease states from biological samples. The methods may include assessing whether a nodule, mass, or cyst is cancerous.
Claims
exact text as granted — not AI-modified1 . A multi-omic method, comprising:
obtaining multi-omic data from a biofluid sample of a subject suspected of having cancer, the multi-omic data comprising proteomic measurements and nucleic acid sequencing measurements; and applying a classifier to the multi-omic data to evaluate the cancer, wherein the classifier comprises protein and nucleic acid features, and wherein the classifier distinguishes between biofluid samples of subjects with and without cancer with a performance characterized by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve having an average or median area under the curve (AUC) of at least 0.9.
2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the ROC curve comprises a true positive rate of at least 0.8 when a false positive rate of the ROC curve is less than 0.05.
3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the ROC curve comprises a true positive rate of at least 0.9 when a false positive rate of the ROC curve is less than 0.2.
4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the classifier distinguishes between biofluid samples of subjects with and without cancer with greater accuracy than a classifier based on either the proteomic measurements or the nucleic acid sequencing measurements alone.
5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the proteomic measurements and the nucleic acid sequencing measurements each comprise at least 500 measurements.
6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the proteomic measurements are generated from proteins adsorbed to nanoparticles.
7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the proteomic measurements are generated upon contacting the biofluid sample with internal standard proteins.
8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the nucleic acid sequencing measurements comprise mRNA sequencing measurements.
9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the nucleic acid sequencing measurements comprise microRNA sequencing measurements.
10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein applying the classifier to the multi-omic data to evaluate the cancer comprises:
applying a first classifier to the proteomic measurements to generate a first label corresponding to a presence, absence, or likelihood of the cancer, applying a second classifier to the nucleic acid sequencing measurements to generate a second label corresponding to a presence, absence, or likelihood of the cancer, and evaluating the cancer based on (a), (b) or (c):
(a) a non-weighted average of the first and second labels,
(b) a weighted average of the first and second labels, or
(c) a majority voting score based on the first and second labels.
11 . The method of claim 10 , further comprising evaluating the cancer based on the weighted average of the first and second labels, wherein the weighted average is generated by assigning weights to results of the first and second classifiers based on area under a ROC curve, area under a precision-recall curve, accuracy, precision, recall, sensitivity, F1-score, specificity, or a combination thereof.
12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein applying the classifier to the multi-omic data to evaluate the cancer comprises:
obtaining a subset of features from among the proteomic measurements; obtaining at least a subset of features from among the nucleic acid sequencing measurements; pooling the subset of features from among the proteomic measurements and the at least the subset of features from among the nucleic acid sequencing measurements to obtain pooled features; and evaluating the cancer based on the pooled features.
13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein obtaining the subset of features from among the proteomic measurements or obtaining at least the subset of features from among the nucleic acid sequencing measurements comprises obtaining top features based on univariate data.
14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the classifier is trained using deep learning, a random forest classification analysis, a support vector machine analysis, a naive Bayes analysis, or a hidden Markov analysis.
15 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the cancer is selected from the group consisting of: lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, colon cancer, liver cancer, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer.
16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the classifier identifies the multi-omic data as indicative of cancer, and wherein the method further comprises administering a chemotherapy, pharmaceutical, radiation or surgical cancer treatment to the subject.
17 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the multi-omic data further comprise lipid or metabolite measurements, and wherein the classifier further comprises lipid or metabolite features.
18 . A multi-omic method, comprising:
obtaining multi-omic data from a biofluid sample of a subject suspected of having cancer, the multi-omic data comprising proteomic measurements and RNA sequencing measurements; and applying a classifier to the multi-omic data to evaluate the cancer, wherein the classifier comprises protein and RNA features, wherein the classifier distinguishes between biofluid samples of subjects with and without cancer with at least 5% greater accuracy than a classifier based on the proteomic measurements alone and with at least 5% greater accuracy than a classifier based on the RNA sequencing measurements alone.
19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the accuracy comprises an area under the curve of a receiver operating characteristic curve.
20 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the accuracy comprises a sensitivity at a given specificity.
21 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the proteomic measurements are generated from proteins adsorbed to nanoparticles.
22 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the proteomic measurements are generated upon contacting the biofluid sample with internal standard proteins.
23 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the RNA sequencing measurements comprise mRNA sequencing measurements.
24 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the RNA sequencing measurements comprise microRNA sequencing measurements.
25 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the classifier that is applied to the multi-omic data identifies the multi-omic data as indicative of cancer, and wherein the method further comprises administering a chemotherapy, pharmaceutical, radiation or surgical cancer treatment to the subject.Cited by (0)
No later patents cite this yet.
References (0)
No backward citations on record.