Generating fairness scores for execution engine output

Abstract

Systems and methods for transaction platforms include various systems interacting with each other and transacting in various ways. A method for configuring and launching a marketplace includes: identifying, by a processing system having one or more processors, an opportunity to facilitate configuration of a new marketplace; receiving marketplace opportunity data, wherein the marketplace opportunity data includes information related to a set of assets of one or more types; determining configuration parameters to be implemented in the new marketplace; determining the feasibility of implementing the configuration parameters in the new marketplace; determining data resources to support the new marketplace; determining an architecture of the new marketplace; determining the configuration of the data resources in a data model for the marketplace; configuring a marketplace object; connecting selected data resources to populate the marketplace object; and launching the new marketplace.

What is claimed is: 
     
         1 . A method for generating a fairness score for execution engine output, the method comprising:
 receiving, by a fairness engine, transaction data from a set of transactions from an execution engine;   receiving, by an execution timing engine, a set of measures of latency for a set of users; and   calculating, with a fairness engine, a disparate latency indicated by the set of measures of latency;   generating a fairness score representing the fairness of a transaction based on the disparate latency for the set of users.   
     
     
         2 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the execution timing engine automatically orchestrates a set of configuration parameters or other features that mitigate unfairness that may be caused by disparate latency. 
     
     
         3 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the set of measures of latency are determined by testing network return times. 
     
     
         4 . The method of  claim 3 , wherein testing network return times includes determining the ping, the upload speed, or the download speed. 
     
     
         5 . The method of  claim 1 , wherein the set of transactions are executed based upon the fairness score exceeding a predetermined threshold. 
     
     
         6 . A system, comprising:
 an execution engine that generates transaction data from a set of transactions as execution engine output;   an execution timing engine that determines or receives a set of measures of latency for a set of users; and   a fairness engine configured to generate a fairness score representing the fairness of a transaction based on the set of measures of latency for the set of users.   
     
     
         7 . The system of  claim 6 , wherein the execution timing engine automatically orchestrates a set of configuration parameters or other features that mitigate unfairness that may be caused by disparate latency. 
     
     
         8 . The system of  claim 6 , wherein the set of measures of latency are determined by testing network return times. 
     
     
         9 . The system of  claim 8 , wherein testing network return times includes determining the ping, the upload speed, or the download speed. 
     
     
         10 . The system of  claim 6 , wherein the set of transactions are executed based upon the fairness score exceeding a predetermined threshold. 
     
     
         11 . A system, comprising:
 an execution engine that generates transaction data from a set of transactions as execution engine output;   an execution timing engine that determines or receives a set of measures of latency for a set of users; and   a fairness engine configured to:
 calculate a disparate latency indicated by the set of measures of latency; 
 generate a fairness score representing the fairness of a transaction based on the disparate latency for the set of users. 
   
     
     
         12 . The system of  claim 11 , wherein the execution timing engine automatically orchestrates a set of configuration parameters or other features that mitigate unfairness that may be caused by disparate latency. 
     
     
         13 . The system of  claim 11 , wherein the set of measures of latency are determined by testing network return times. 
     
     
         14 . The system of  claim 13 , wherein testing network return times includes determining the ping, the upload speed, or the download speed. 
     
     
         15 . The system of  claim 11 , wherein the set of transactions are executed based upon the fairness score exceeding a predetermined threshold.