Meta-bis anilide derivatives and their utility as herbicides
Abstract
Compounds corresponding to the formula: ##SPC1## In which R 1 and R 2 are, independently, hydrogen, alkyl, alkoxyalkyl, cycloalkyl, pinonyl, ethylcycloalkyl, lower alkenyl, halogenated lower alkyl, benzyl, ethylphenyl, 2,4-dichlorophenoxy-methylene, styryl, furyl, phenyl or substituted phenyl in which the substituents are nitro, halogen, methyl, or methoxy; R 3 and R 4 are, independently, hydrogen or lower alkyl; X and Y are independently oxygen or sulfur; and Z is halogen, nitro, amino, lower alkyl, lower alkoxy or trifluoromethyl and n is an integer having a value from 0 to 4. The above compounds are effective herbicides, particularly for the control of grasses and broadleaf plants with both pre-emergence and post-emergence activity. Representative compounds are: m-propionamidobutyranilide, m-bis-2,2-dimethylvaleranilide, m-isobutyramido trichloroacetanilide, m-isobutyramido-2-ethylbutyranilide, m-t-butylacetamidopropanilide, and 3'-N-ethyl propionamido-propanilide.
Claims
exact text as granted — not AI-modifiedWhat is claimed is:
1. A method for controlling the growth of vegetation which comprises applying to the area where control of said vegetative growth is desired, a growth controlling amount of a compound having the formula ##SPC4## in which R 1 and R 2 are independently selected from the group consisting of alkyl containing from 1 through about 10 carbon atoms, inclusive, and lower alkenyl.
2. The method according to claim 1 in which R 1 and R 2 are independent alkyl groups.
3. The method according to claim 2 in which R 1 is ethyl and R 2 is n-propyl.
4. The method according to claim 2 in which R 1 is 1,1-dimethylbutyl and R 2 is 1,1-dimethylbutyl.
5. The method according to claim 2 in which R 1 is 1-ethylpropyl and R 2 is isopropyl.
6. The method according to claim 2 in which R 1 is neopentyl and R 2 is ethyl.
7. The method according to claim 2 in which R 1 is neopentyl and R 2 is isopropyl.
8. The method according to claim 2 in which R 1 is tert-butyl and R 2 is neopentyl.
9. The method according to claim 2 in which R 1 is 1,1-dimethylbutyl and R 2 is neopentyl.
10. The method according to claim 2 in which R 1 is sec-butyl and R 2 is ethyl.
11. The method according to claim 2 in which R 1 is sec-butyl and R 2 is sec-butyl.
12. The method according to claim 2 in which R 1 is sec-butyl and R 2 is tert-butyl.
13. The method according to claim 2 in which R 1 is sec-butyl and R 2 is neopentyl.
14. The method according to claim 2 in which R 1 is 1-ethylpropyl and R 2 is ethyl.
15. The method according to claim 2 in which R 1 is 1,1-dimethylbutyl and R 2 is ethyl.
16. The method according to claim 1 in which R 1 is lower alkenyl and R 2 is lower alkenyl.
17. The method according to claim 16 in which R 1 is 2,2-dimethylvinyl and R 2 is 2,2-dimethylvinyl.
18. The method according to claim 1 in which R 1 is lower alkenyl and R 2 is alkyl.
19. The method according to claim 18 in which R 1 is 2,2-dimethylvinyl, R 2 is tert-butyl.
20. The method according to claim 18 in which R 1 is 2,2-dimethylvinyl, R 2 is 1,1-dimethylbutyl.
21. The method according to claim 18 in which R 1 is 2,2-dimethylvinyl, R 2 is ethyl.
22. The method according to claim 18 in which R 1 is vinyl, R 2 is ethyl.
23. A method according to claim 2 in which R 1 is 2,4,4-trimethylpentyl and R 2 is 1,1-dimethylbutyl.
24. A method according to claim 2 in which R 1 is 1-methylbuyl and R 2 is tert-butyl.Cited by (0)
No later patents cite this yet.
References (0)
No backward citations on record.