P
US9628151B2ActiveUtilityPatentIndex 73

Selection of access points for coordinated multipoint uplink reception

Assignee: ERICSSON TELEFON AB L MPriority: Oct 17, 2012Filed: Oct 17, 2012Granted: Apr 18, 2017
Est. expiryOct 17, 2032(~6.3 yrs left)· nominal 20-yr term from priority
Inventors:HESSLER MARTINFURUSKÄR ANDERS
H04B 17/364H04W 36/0061H04W 36/0083H04W 48/20H04B 7/024H04W 36/0085
73
PatentIndex Score
2
Cited by
7
References
14
Claims

Abstract

The proposed technology involves a mechanism for selecting, for a user, access points for coordinated multipoint (COMP) uplink reception. The method comprises obtaining, for each of a number of candidate access points, at least one uplink measurement result. The method also involves combining candidate access points to form at least two different sets of access points from the candidate access points. The method comprises estimating, for each one of the at least two different sets of access points, an uplink quality measure based on the uplink measurement results of the considered set of access points, and determining, for each one of the at least two different sets of access points, a measure representative of the number of transmission opportunities available to the user for the considered set of access points over a given period of time. The method also comprises selecting which one of the at least two different sets of access points to use for COMP uplink reception based on the uplink quality measure and the measure representative of the number of transmission opportunities available to the user over the given period of time.

Claims

exact text as granted — not AI-modified
The invention claimed is: 
     
       1. A method on the network side of a wireless communication network for selecting, for a user, access points for coordinated multipoint (COMP) uplink reception, wherein said method comprises:
 obtaining, for each of a number of candidate access points, at least one uplink measurement result; 
 combining candidate access points to form at least two different sets of access points from said candidate access points; 
 for each one of said at least two different set of access points:
 estimating an uplink quality measure based on the uplink measurement results of the set of access points; 
 determining a measure representative of the number of transmission opportunities available to the user for the set of access points over a given period of time, said measure representative of the number of transmission opportunities being at least partly dependent on a data retransmission operating mode used in at least one uplink of the set of access points; and 
 
 selecting which one of said at least two different sets of access points to use for COMP uplink reception based on said uplink quality measure and said measure representative of the number of transmission opportunities available to the user over said given period of time. 
 
     
     
       2. The method of  claim 1 , wherein said measure representative of the number of transmission opportunities available to the user over said given period of time is at least partly dependent on backhaul delay between access points in the backhaul network of the wireless communication network. 
     
     
       3. The method of  claim 2 , wherein said step of selecting which one of said at least two different sets of access points to use for COMP uplink reception is based on evaluating uplink quality in relation to the number of transmission opportunities available to the user over said given period of time taking into account the backhaul delay between access points in the backhaul network. 
     
     
       4. The method of  claim 3 , wherein said step of selecting which one of said at least two different sets of access points to use for COMP uplink reception is based on considering a difference in uplink quality between said at least two different sets of access points in relation to a corresponding difference in number of transmission opportunities over said given period of time due to a difference in backhaul delay. 
     
     
       5. The method of  claim 1 , wherein said step of selecting which one of said at least two different sets of access points to use for COMP uplink reception comprises the step of processing said uplink quality measure in relation to at least one configurable threshold. 
     
     
       6. The method of  claim 5 , wherein said at least one configurable threshold is dependent on said measure representative of the number of transmission opportunities available to the user for the considered set of access points over said given period of time taking into account backhaul delay from the access points to the entity responsible for uplink decoding. 
     
     
       7. The method of  claim 5 , wherein said step of selecting which one of said at least two different sets of access points to use for COMP uplink reception comprises:
 identifying the largest number of access points where an uplink quality measure gain obtained from adding an extra access point is above a first threshold; and 
 at least one of:
 selecting the set of access points that provides the best uplink quality measure among the set(s) that has/have a size corresponding to the identified largest number of access points; and 
 selecting the smallest set of access points that gives an uplink quality measure above a second threshold. 
 
 
     
     
       8. The method of  claim 5 , wherein said at least one configurable threshold is dependent on the type of session of the user. 
     
     
       9. The method of  claim 8 , wherein said at least one configurable threshold is dependent on at least one of:
 estimated time the user will be active in a session; 
 amount of data the user will transmit in the uplink in a session; 
 estimated spectral efficiency in a session; and 
 estimated uplink bitrate in a session. 
 
     
     
       10. The method of  claim 1 , wherein said step of selecting which one of said at least two different sets of access points to use for COMP uplink reception comprises, for each one of said at least two different sets of access points:
 estimating a measure representative of user performance at least partly based on the uplink quality measure of the set of access points and the measure representative of the number of transmission opportunities available to the user for the set of access points over said given period of time; and 
 wherein selecting which one of said at least two different sets of access points to use for COMP uplink reception is further based on the estimated measures representative of user performance. 
 
     
     
       11. A device on the network side of a wireless communication network, said device being configured to select, for a user, access points for coordinated multipoint (COMP) uplink reception, wherein said device comprises:
 a measurement result obtainer configured to obtain, for each of a number of candidate access points, at least one uplink measurement result; 
 a combiner configured to combine candidate access points to form at least two different sets of access points from said candidate access points; 
 an estimator configured to estimate, for each one of said at least two different sets of access points, an uplink quality measure based on the uplink measurement results of the one of said at least two different sets of access points; 
 a determiner configured to determine, for each one of said at least two different sets of access points, a measure representative of the number of transmission opportunities available to the user for the one of said at least two different sets set of access points over a given period of time, said measure representative of the number of transmission opportunities being at least partly dependent on a data retransmission operating mode used in at least one uplink of the one of said at least two different sets of access points; and 
 an access point selector configured to select which one of said at least two different sets of access points to use for COMP uplink reception based on said uplink quality measure and said measure representative of the number of transmission opportunities available to the user over said given period of time. 
 
     
     
       12. The device of  claim 11 , wherein said determiner is configured to determine said measure representative of the number of transmission opportunities available to the user over said given period of time at least partly in dependence on backhaul delay between access points in the backhaul network of the wireless communication network. 
     
     
       13. The device of  claim 11 , wherein the device is comprised in at least a portion of a network node in a wireless communication network. 
     
     
       14. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising one or more computer programs for performing, when run on a processor of a network node of a wireless communication network, a method for selecting, for a user, access points for coordinated multipoint (COMP) uplink reception, wherein said method comprises the steps of:
 obtaining, for each of a number of candidate access points, at least one uplink measurement result; 
 combining candidate access points to form at least two different sets of access points from said candidate access points; 
 for each one of said at least two different set of access points:
 estimating an uplink quality measure based on the uplink measurement results of the set of access points; 
 determining a measure representative of the number of transmission opportunities available to the user for the set of access points over a given period of time, said measure representative of the number of transmission opportunities being at least partly dependent on a data retransmission operating mode used in at least one uplink of the set of access points; and 
 
 selecting which one of said at least two different sets of access points to use for COMP uplink reception based on said uplink quality measure and said measure representative of the number of transmission opportunities available to the user over said given period of time.

Cited by (0)

No later patents cite this yet.

References (0)

No backward citations on record.